...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Biology >Relative Contributions of Specific Activity Histories and Spontaneous Processes to Size Remodeling of Glutamatergic Synapses
【24h】

Relative Contributions of Specific Activity Histories and Spontaneous Processes to Size Remodeling of Glutamatergic Synapses

机译:特定活动历史和自发过程对谷氨酸能突触大小重构的相对贡献。

获取原文
           

摘要

The idea that synaptic properties are defined by specific pre- and postsynaptic activity histories is one of the oldest and most influential tenets of contemporary neuroscience. Recent studies also indicate, however, that synaptic properties often change spontaneously, even in the absence of specific activity patterns or any activity whatsoever. What, then, are the relative contributions of activity history-dependent and activity history-independent processes to changes synapses undergo? To compare the relative contributions of these processes, we imaged, in spontaneously active networks of cortical neurons, glutamatergic synapses formed between the same axons and neurons or dendrites under the assumption that their similar activity histories should result in similar size changes over timescales of days. The size covariance of such commonly innervated (CI) synapses was then compared to that of synapses formed by different axons (non-CI synapses) that differed in their activity histories. We found that the size covariance of CI synapses was greater than that of non-CI synapses; yet overall size covariance of CI synapses was rather modest. Moreover, momentary and time-averaged sizes of CI synapses correlated rather poorly, in perfect agreement with published electron microscopy-based measurements of mouse cortex synapses. A conservative estimate suggested that ~40% of the observed size remodeling was attributable to specific activity histories, whereas ~10% and ~50% were attributable to cell-wide and spontaneous, synapse-autonomous processes, respectively. These findings demonstrate that histories of naturally occurring activity patterns can direct glutamatergic synapse remodeling but also suggest that the contributions of spontaneous, possibly stochastic, processes are at least as great. Contrary to expectations, specific activity histories account for less than half of the remodeling exhibited by individual glutamatergic synapses in spontaneously active networks of cortical neurons. Author Summary The modification of synaptic connections by specific activity histories (a phenomenon known as synaptic plasticity) is widely believed to represent a major substrate of processes collectively referred to as learning and memory. Recent studies indicate, however, that synapses also change spontaneously, even in the absence of specific activity histories—or, for that matter, any activity whatsoever. This raises a fundamental question: how do changes directed by specific activity histories quantitatively compare to spontaneous changes in synaptic properties? Put differently—what is the “signal-to-noise ratio” of synaptic plasticity at individual synapses? To address this question we followed—over several days—pairs of synapses formed between the same neurons under the assumption that their common activity histories should drive similar changes in their sizes. Indeed, sizes of such synapses tended to change in a correlated manner; yet the extent of this correlation was surprisingly modest, accounting for less than half of the changes that such synapses exhibited. Moreover, sizes of synapses with apparently common activity histories tended to be quite different. Our findings thus indicate that the “signal-to-noise ratio” of synapse remodeling might be rather poor, on the order of 1:1 or less.
机译:由特定的突触前和突触后活动历史定义突触特性的想法是当代神经科学最古老,最有影响力的宗旨之一。但是,最近的研究还表明,即使没有特定的活动模式或任何活动,突触性质也经常自发改变。那么,与活动历史相关和与活动历史无关的过程对突触变化的相对贡献是什么?为了比较这些过程的相对贡献,我们在皮层神经元的自发活动网络中对相同轴突与神经元或树突之间形成的谷氨酸能突触进行了成像,并假设它们的相似活动历史应导致几天内时间尺度的相似大小变化。然后将这种通常被神经支配的(CI)突触的大小协方差与其活动历史不同的不同轴突(非CI突触)形成的突触的大小协方差进行比较。我们发现CI突触的大小协方差大于非CI突触的大小。然而,CI突触的整体大小协方差很小。此外,CI突触的瞬时和时间平均大小相关性很差,这与已发布的基于电子显微镜的小鼠皮质突触测量结果完全吻合。保守的估计表明,观察到的大小重塑的〜40%归因于特定的活动历史,而〜10%和〜50%分别归因于细胞范围的和自发的突触自主过程。这些发现表明,自然发生的活动模式的历史可以指导谷氨酸能突触的重塑,但也表明自发的,可能是随机的过程的贡献至少一样大。与预期相反,特定活动历史占皮层神经元自发活跃网络中单个谷氨酸能突触所展现的重塑不到一半。作者总结特定活动历史(一种称为突触可塑性的现象)对突触连接的修饰被广泛认为是共同被称为学习和记忆的主要过程。但是,最近的研究表明,即使没有特定的活动历史,或者就此而言,任何活动,突触也会自发改变。这就提出了一个基本的问题:特定活动历史指导的变化与突触特性的自发变化如何定量比较?换句话说,在各个突触中突触可塑性的“信噪比”是多少?为了解决这个问题,我们在几天之内遵循相同神经元之间的突触对,假设它们的共同活动史应该驱动相似的大小变化。实际上,这种突触的大小倾向于以相关的方式改变。然而,这种关联的程度令人惊讶地适度,仅占这种突触所表现出的变化的不到一半。此外,具有明显共同活动历史的突触的大小往往有很大的不同。因此,我们的发现表明,突触重塑的“信噪比”可能相当差,约为1:1或更小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号