首页> 外文期刊>Policy and Society >Diverse property rights, institutions and decentralisation: Forest management by village forest councils in Uttarakhand
【24h】

Diverse property rights, institutions and decentralisation: Forest management by village forest councils in Uttarakhand

机译:多样化的产权,机构和权力下放:北阿坎德邦乡村森林委员会进行森林管理

获取原文
           

摘要

This study of decentralised institutions for forest management brings out the varied dimensions of local institutions and politics as they interface with property rights and decentralisation. Unlike the economic literature on decentralisation that is dominated by normative and prescriptive arguments on how a shift towards decentralisation should take place, this paper makes a case for re-centering of the political in the decentralisation literature. This political study of decentralisation does not prescribe decentralisation rules, but weighs the different social, economic and ecological outcomes under varied local conditions. It takes note of the diversity of local institutions and politics in the interpretation of formal rules, power relations, legal rights, moral claims, social custom, and the establishment of informal institutional arrangements. This is done in the context of questioning the typologies of neat property regimes that are broadly categorised as – open-access, state, private and common property - in the economic literature. These widely accepted typologies are tested at the local level and it is found that ownership does not necessarily refer to control and use of resources. The paper highlights the heterogeneity of property regimes under which the village communities manage the forests, and points out that specific state-society relations in particular villages determine the entitlements of the villagers. Importantly, the nature of collective action on decentralisation and negotiation of institutional design has an impact on the consequences at the local level. As the local reality is based on varied local resources, institutions, political processes and social capital, uniform national or state policies have very different local outcomes. This paper asks if it is possible to evolve policies that incorporate diverse institutional arrangements with a combination of different kinds of property rights under decentralised local governance management.
机译:这项关于森林管理权力下放机构的研究揭示了地方机构和政治与产权和权力下放相联系的不同方面。与关于权力下放的经济学文献不同,该文献以关于如何向权力下放的规范性和规范性争论为主导,本文提出了在权力下放文献中重新定位政治的理由。这项关于权力下放的政治研究并未规定权力下放规则,而是权衡了不同地方条件下不同的社会,经济和生态成果。它在解释正式规则,权力关系,法律权利,道德主张,社会风俗和建立非正式制度安排时注意到地方制度和政治的多样性。这样做的前提是要质疑在经济学文献中被归类为开放获取,国家,私有和公共财产的净财产制度的类型。这些广泛接受的类型在本地进行了测试,发现所有权并不一定涉及资源的控制和使用。本文强调了村民社区管理森林所依据的财产制度的异质性,并指出特定村庄中特定的国家社会关系决定了村民的权利。重要的是,在权力下放和机构设计谈判中采取集体行动的性质会影响地方一级的后果。由于当地现实基于各种地方资源,机构,政治进程和社会资本,因此统一的国家或州政策在地方上有很大不同。本文询问在分散的地方治理管理下,是否有可能制定出将各种制度安排与不同种类的产权相结合的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号