首页> 外文期刊>Pilot and Feasibility Studies >Manual acupuncture plus usual care versus usual care alone in the treatment of endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
【24h】

Manual acupuncture plus usual care versus usual care alone in the treatment of endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study

机译:手工针刺加常规护理与常规护理相比单独治疗子宫内膜异位症相关慢性盆腔痛:随机对照可行性研究的研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Endometriosis is the most common cause of chronic pelvic pain worldwide. Non-surgical treatments are effective for only 30–50% of women and have a significant side effect burden that leads to high discontinuation rates. Surgery can be effective but is expensive and invasive, and symptoms tend to recur within 5?years. There is early evidence that acupuncture may be effective in treating endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain, showing clinically significant analgesia. Both levels of inflammation and pain processing have been shown to be altered in women with chronic pelvic pain. Acupuncture has been shown to reduce inflammation and change central pain processing in other conditions, but research on women with endometriosis is currently lacking. The aim of this feasibility study is to provide data on recruitment rates, retention, appropriateness of outcome measures, minimal clinically important difference in numeric rated scales for pain and the potential effect of acupuncture on pain processing and markers of inflammation in endometriosis-related CPP.MethodsWe will include women aged 18–45?years with a diagnosis of endometriosis via laparoscopy in the past 5?years. A total of 30 participants will be recruited and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive acupuncture or usual care. Women in the acupuncture group will receive two 45-min treatment sessions per week for 8?weeks (total of 16 sessions). Women in the usual care group will continue with their current treatment regimen. The primary feasibility outcomes are recruitment rates, retention rates and the safety and acceptability of the intervention; secondary patient-centred outcomes include a change in 0–10 daily pelvic pain ratings, the Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) and changes in conditioned pain modulation, resting and task-related EEG activity and inflammatory markers. Analyses will be performed blind to group allocation.DiscussionThis is a two-armed, assessor blind, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Data will be compared at baseline and trial completion 8?weeks later. Outcomes from this feasibility study will inform a larger, fully powered clinical trial should the treatment show trends for potential effectiveness.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000053325 (http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12617000053325.aspx).
机译:子宫内膜异位症是全世界慢性盆腔痛的最常见原因。非手术治疗仅对30%至50%的妇女有效,​​并且具有明显的副作用负担,导致较高的停用率。手术可能有效,但昂贵且具有侵入性,而且症状往往在5年内复发。早期证据表明,针灸可有效治疗子宫内膜异位症相关的慢性盆腔痛,具有临床上的重要镇痛作用。在患有慢性盆腔痛的女性中,炎症和疼痛处理的水平都已改变。在其他情况下,针灸可减轻炎症并改变中枢性疼痛,但目前缺乏对子宫内膜异位症女性的研究。这项可行性研究的目的是提供有关招募率,保留率,结果措施的适用性,疼痛数字额定量表的最小临床重要差异以及针灸对疼痛处理和子宫内膜异位症相关CPP炎症标志物的潜在影响的数据。方法我们将纳入过去5年中通过腹腔镜检查诊断为子宫内膜异位的18-45岁女性。将招募总共30名参与者,并按1:1比例随机分配他们以接受针灸或常规护理。针灸组的女性每周将接受两次45分钟的疗程,共8周,共16次。常规护理组中的妇女将继续其当前的治疗方案。主要的可行性结果是招募率,保留率以及干预措施的安全性和可接受性;以患者为中心的次要结局包括每日骨盆疼痛评分0-10改变,子宫内膜异位症健康状况30(EHP-30)以及条件性疼痛调节,休息和与任务相关的脑电活动和炎症标志物的变化。分析将在不分配组的情况下进行。讨论这是一个两臂,评估者盲,随机对照的可行性试验。将在8周后比较基线和完成试验的数据。如果该治疗方案显示出潜在的疗效趋势,则该可行性研究的结果将为一项更大的,功能强大的临床试验提供参考。试验注册澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12617000053325(http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12617000053325.aspx)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号