首页> 外文期刊>Phytologia >Contrasting perspectives on the measurements and taxonomy of Arceuthobium (Viscaceae): a long standing controversy
【24h】

Contrasting perspectives on the measurements and taxonomy of Arceuthobium (Viscaceae): a long standing controversy

机译:关于牛尾藻(粘菌科)的测量和分类的不同观点:长期存在的争议

获取原文
           

摘要

Kuijt (2016) recently published an exceptionally critical, unsolicited review of two articles on thetaxonomic classification of dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium, Viscaceae:) as well as the methods andmorphological characters utilized to delimit taxa. We respond to the criticisms of our methods andconclusions as presented in a paper we recently published in Phytologia on the morphometric analysis ofthree species in sect. Campylopoda: A. campylopodum, A. laricis, and A. tsugense. Kuijt claimed that thefoundation of our taxonomic conclusions for these taxa was primarily based on differences in the lengthof the third internode. This assertion is incorrect. The validity of these species was based on statisticalinferences across multiple morphological characters from measurements of both male and female plants.Furthermore, Kuijt inferred that little information is currently available on the susceptibility of hosts totaxa in sect. Campylopoda. Again, we disagree and point out that there is a large body of literaturedemonstrating that there is host preference (i.e., host specificity) among the species of sect.Campylopoda—evidence that Kuijt has consistently ignored. The taxonomic classification he hasproposed for sect. Campylopoda is equivalent to that available in the late 1800’s. The implication is thatno data relevant to the classification of this group has appeared for over 100 years! We summarized ourposition on the classification of sect. Campylopoda with supporting publications and point out theweaknesses in Kuijt’s critique of our work. Research is never complete and additional data are alwayswelcome, particularly from new molecular studies. However, at the present state of our knowledge wewill continue to recognize the taxa in sect. Campylopoda as species—a classification used by mostprofessional botanists and resource managers for over 40 years. Published on-line www.phytologia.orgPhytologia 99(2): 95-110 (May 9, 2017). ISSN 030319430.
机译:Kuijt(2016)最近发表了一篇关于两篇有关矮小槲寄生的分类学(Arceuthobium,Viscaceae :)以及用来界定类群的方法和形态学特征的文章的极其重要的,未经请求的评论。我们回应了对我们的方法和结论的批评,这些批评是我们最近在《植物学》上发表的一篇论文中提出的,该论文涉及该教派中三种物种的形态计量学分析。弯曲菌:弯曲菌,弯曲菌和tsu虫。 Kuijt声称,我们对这些分类单元的分类学结论的基础主要是基于第三个节点间长度的差异。该断言是不正确的。这些物种的有效性基于对雄性和雌性植物的多种形态学特征的统计推断。此外,Kuijt推断,目前尚无关于寄主对该分类的寄主敏感性的信息。弯曲藻。再次,我们不同意并指出,有大量文献表明,Campylopoda属之间存在寄主偏爱(即寄主特异性),这是Kuijt一直无视的证据。他已经提议了该分类的分类。 Campylopoda相当于1800年代后期的版本。这意味着超过100年没有出现与该组的分类有关的数据!我们总结了关于教派分类的立场。 Campylopoda提供支持性出版物,并指出Kuijt对我们工作的批评中的弱点。研究永远不会完成,总是欢迎提供更多数据,尤其是来自新分子研究的数据。但是,以我们目前的知识水平,我们将继续认识该分类单元。弯曲菌属物种— 40多年来,大多数专业植物学家和资源管理者使用的分类。在线发表于www.phytologia.org植物学99(2):95-110(2017年5月9日)。 ISSN 030319430。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号