首页> 外文期刊>Peri >A determina??o ontológica das categorias em Hegel e Marx
【24h】

A determina??o ontológica das categorias em Hegel e Marx

机译:黑格尔和马克思的范畴的本体论决定

获取原文
       

摘要

Normal 0 21 false false false PT-BR X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabela normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} O presente texto tem como objetivo esclarecer a natureza ontológica das categorias na teoria marxiana e como esta tem seu ponto de inflex?o na considera??o hegeliana das categorias, expressa na Ciência da lógica. Na teoria marxiana, as categorias comparecem como formas moventes e movidas da realidade, contrapondo-se às concep??es que tentam erigir os preceitos meramente gnosiológicos como critérios fundamentais de constitui??o das matrizes categoriais. Apesar das insuficiências do primado hierárquico das determina??es lógicas sobre as determina??es ontológicas que perpassam a perspectiva hegeliana, é relevante destacar como essa perspectiva se apresenta como a primeira tentativa de constitui??o dum tratamento correto das categorias, o que lhe confere o posto de descobridora de territórios ainda n?o explorados e somente levados a sua pertinente elucida??o pela media??o da dialética materialista. Nesta, é pertinente observar a rela??o reflexiva existente entre as categorias simples e as categorias complexas. Palavras-chave : Determina??es reflexivas. Realidade. Trabalho. G. Lukács. Abstract : The present text has as objective clarify the ontological nature of the categories in the Marx's theory and how this has its support in Hegel's considerations in the categories expressed in Science of logic. In Marx's theory, the categories stand as the moving and moved forms of reality, it opposed to the conceptions that try to raise the merely gnosiologic precepts as fundamental criterions of constitutions of the categorical matrixes. Besides the insufficiencies of the hierarchical primacy of the logical determinations upon the ontological determinations that spervades the Hegelian perspective, it is elementary highlight how this perspective the first attempt to formulate a correct treatment of the categories, what confers it the position of discoverer of territories not yet explored and only pertinently elucidated by the mediation of the materialist dialectical. For this, it is pertinent to observe the reflexive relation existing between the simple categories and the complex categories, and how the class struggle appears as the fundamental category to the explanation of the population's abstract category. Keywords : Reflexive determinations. Reality. Labour. G. Lukács.? ?
机译:正常0 21否否否EN-UK X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 / *样式定义* / table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:“ Normal table”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:是; mso样式优先级:99; mso-style-qformat:是; mso-style-parent:“”; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;边距:0cm; mso-margin-bottom:.0001pt;中间分页:寡妇孤儿;字体大小:11.0pt;字体家族:“ Calibri”,“ sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:次要拉丁语; mso-fareast-font-family:“时代新罗马”; mso-fareast-theme-font:次远东; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:次要拉丁语; mso-bidi-font-family:“时代新罗马”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}本文旨在阐明马克思主义理论中范畴的本体论性质,以及这在黑格尔对范畴的考虑中如何具有转折点,如科学所表示逻辑。在马克思主义理论中,范畴表现为现实的移动形式,与试图建立纯粹的逻辑学原理作为构成分类矩阵的基本标准的概念相反。尽管在贯穿于黑格尔主义观点的本体论确定之上,逻辑确定的等级优先性不足,但重要的是要强调这种观点是如何构成对类别的正确处理的首次尝试。它赋予了它尚未探索的发现者的位置,而只是通过唯物辩证法的调解才对其进行了阐释。在这种情况下,有必要观察简单类别和复杂类别之间存在的自反关系。关键字:反思性的决心。现实。工作。 G.卢卡奇。摘要:本文以客观的方式阐明了马克思理论中范畴的本体论性质,以及它如何在黑格尔关于逻辑科学表达的范畴中的考虑中得到支持。在马克思的理论中,范畴是现实的移动形式,它与试图提出纯粹的地学学说作为分类矩阵构成的基本标准的概念相反。除了逻辑决定论的等级优先性不足以充斥黑格尔主义观点的本体论决定之外,它的基本要点是,这种观点是如何首次尝试对类别进行正确的处理,是什么赋予了它发现领土的地位?然而,只有通过辩证唯物主义者的调解,才有探索和阐明。为此,有必要观察简单类别和复杂类别之间存在的自反关系,以及阶级斗争如何作为解释人口抽象类别的基本类别而出现。关键字:反身决心。现实。劳动。 G.卢卡奇。? ?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号