...
首页> 外文期刊>Parasites Vectors >Evaluation of an ultraviolet LED trap for catching Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes in south-eastern Tanzania
【24h】

Evaluation of an ultraviolet LED trap for catching Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes in south-eastern Tanzania

机译:紫外线灯诱捕坦桑尼亚南部东南部按蚊和库蚊的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract BackgroundImproved surveillance techniques are required to accelerate efforts against major arthropod-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue, filariasis, Zika and yellow-fever. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are increasingly used in mosquito traps because they improve energy efficiency and battery longevity relative to incandescent bulbs. This study evaluated the efficacy of a new ultraviolet LED trap (Mosclean) against standard mosquito collection methods.MethodsThe study was conducted in controlled semi-field settings and in field conditions in rural south-eastern Tanzania. The Mosclean trap was compared to commonly used techniques, namely CDC-light traps, human landing catches (HLCs), BG-Sentinel traps and Suna traps.ResultsWhen simultaneously placed inside the same semi-field chamber, the Mosclean trap caught twice as many Anopheles arabiensis as the CDC-light trap, and equal numbers to HLCs. Similar results were obtained when traps were tested individually in the chambers. Under field settings, Mosclean traps caught equal numbers of An. arabiensis and twice as many Culex mosquitoes as CDC-light traps. It was also better at trapping malaria vectors compared to both Suna and BG-Sentinel traps, and was more efficient in collecting mosquitoes indoors than outdoors. The majority of An. arabiensis females caught by Mosclean traps were parous (63.6%) and inseminated (89.8%). In comparison, the females caught by CDC-light traps were 43.9% parous and 92.8% inseminated.ConclusionsThe UV LED trap (Mosclean trap) was efficacious for sampling Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes. Its efficacy was comparable to and in some instances better than traps commonly used for vector surveillance. The Mosclean trap was more productive in sampling mosquitoes indoors compared to outdoors. The trap can be used indoors near human-occupied nets, or outdoors, in which case additional CO2 improves catches. We conclude that this trap may have potential for mosquito surveillance. However, we recommend additional field tests to validate these findings in multiple settings and to assess the potential of LEDs to attract non-target organisms, especially outdoors.
机译:摘要背景需要改进的监视技术,以加快对主要节肢动物传播疾病的努力,例如疟疾,登革热,丝虫病,寨卡病毒和黄热病。发光二极管(LED)越来越多地用于诱蚊器,因为它们相对于白炽灯泡提高了能效并延长了电池寿命。这项研究评估了新型紫外线LED诱集装置(Mosclean)对抗标准蚊子收集方法的功效。方法该研究是在坦桑尼亚东南部农村地区的受控半场环境和田间条件下进行的。将Mosclean陷阱与CDC-light陷阱,人类着陆陷阱(HLC),BG-Sentinel陷阱和Suna陷阱等常用技术进行了比较。结果当同时放置在同一半场室内时,Mosclean陷阱捕获到的按蚊是两倍阿拉伯菊作为CDC诱捕器,与HLC数量相等。当陷阱在隔室中单独测试时,获得了相似的结果。在字段设置下,Mosclean陷阱捕获到相等数量的An。阿拉伯蚊和库蚊蚊子的数量是CDC诱捕器的两倍。与Suna和BG-Sentinel陷阱相比,它在捕获疟疾媒介方面也更好,并且在室内比室外收集蚊子更有效。占多数。被Mosclean诱捕器捕获的阿拉伯雌性为双胎(63.6%)和受精(89.8%)。相比之下,被CDC诱捕器捕获的雌性为43.9%的经产者和92.8%的受精者。结论UV LED诱集剂(Mosclean诱集剂)能有效地采样按蚊和库蚊蚊。它的功效与通常用于媒介物监视的陷阱相当,在某些情况下也要好于陷阱。与室外相比,Mosclean捕集阱在室内蚊子采样方面效率更高。捕集阱可以在靠近人的蚊帐的室内使用,也可以在室外使用,在这种情况下,额外的二氧化碳可以改善捕捞量。我们得出的结论是,该诱捕器可能具有进行蚊子监视的潜力。但是,我们建议进行其他现场测试,以在多种环境下验证这些发现,并评估LED吸引非目标生物(尤其是室外生物)的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号