首页> 外文期刊>Parasites Vectors >Efficacy and safety of sarolaner (Simparica?) in the treatment and control of naturally occurring flea infestations in dogs presented as veterinary patients in Australia
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of sarolaner (Simparica?) in the treatment and control of naturally occurring flea infestations in dogs presented as veterinary patients in Australia

机译:sarolaner(Simparica?)在澳大利亚作为兽医患者的狗中治疗和控制自然发生的跳蚤侵袭的功效和安全性

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of a novel isoxazoline compound, sarolaner (Simparica?, Zoetis) and spinosad (Comfortis?, Elanco) as a positive control were evaluated for the treatment and control of natural flea infestations on dogs in two randomised, blinded, multi-centric clinical trials conducted in 11 veterinary clinics in northeastern and southeastern states of Australia. MethodsA total of 162 client-owned dogs (80 in northern study and 82 in southern study) from 105 households were enrolled. Each household was randomly allocated to receive either sarolaner (Simparica?, Zoetis) or spinosad (Comfortis?, Elanco). Dogs were dosed on Days 0, 30 and 60 and physical examinations and flea counts were conducted on Days 0, 14, 30, 60 and 90. Efficacy assessments were based on the percentage reduction in live flea counts post-treatment compared to Day 0. ResultsIn the northern study, at enrolment, primary dogs had flea counts ranging from 5 to 772. At the first efficacy assessment on Day 14, sarolaner resulted in 99.3% mean reduction in live flea counts relative to Day 0, compared to 94.6% in the spinosad group. On Day 30, the sarolaner-treated group had mean efficacy of 99.2% compared to 95.7% in the spinosad-treated group, and on days 60 and 90, both groups had mean efficacies of ≥?98.8%. In the southern study, at enrolment, primary dogs had flea counts ranging from 5 to 156. Both sarolaner and spinosad resulted in ≥?96.7% mean reduction in live flea counts on Day 14. On Day 30, the sarolaner-treated group had mean efficacy of 99.5% compared to 89.7% in the spinosad-treated group, and on days 60 and 90, both groups had mean efficacies of ≥?98.6%. No treatment-related adverse events were observed in either study. ConclusionsA single monthly dose of sarolaner (Simparica?) administered orally at 2–4?mg/kg for three consecutive months was well tolerated and provided excellent efficacy against natural infestations of fleas under a range of Australian field conditions including different climatic and housing conditions. Similar efficacy was observed with spinosad (Comfortis?) after the second and third monthly treatments.
机译:背景评估了新型异恶唑啉化合物sarolaner(Simparica ?,Zoetis)和多杀菌素(Comfortis ?,Elanco)作为阳性对照的疗效和安全性。在澳大利亚东北和东南部州的11家兽医诊所进行的两项随机,双盲,多中心临床试验中,对狗的天然跳蚤为害。方法招募了来自105个家庭的162只客户拥有的狗(北部研究为80只狗,南部研究为82只狗)。每个家庭被随机分配为接受sarolaner(Soeparica ?,Zoetis)或多杀菌素(Comfortis ?,Elanco)。在第0、30和60天给狗服药,并在第0、14、30、60和90天进行身体检查和跳蚤计数。功效评估是基于与第0天相比治疗后活跳蚤计数减少的百分比。结果在北部研究中,入组时原犬的跳蚤计数在5到772之间。在第14天进行首次功效评估时,sarolaner导致活跳数相对于第0天平均减少了99.3%,而相比之下,第0天为94.6%。多杀菌素组。在第30天,使用sarolaner治疗组的平均功效为99.2%,而在多杀菌素治疗组中的平均功效为95.7%,在第60天和第90天,两组的平均功效均≥98.8%。在南部研究中,在入学时,原犬的跳蚤计数在5到156之间。sarolaner和spinosad均导致第14天的活蚤计数平均降低≥96.7%,在第30天,经sarolaner治疗的组的平均跳蚤计数疗效为99.5%,而多杀菌素治疗组为89.7%,在第60天和第90天,两组的平均疗效均≥98.6%。两项研究均未观察到与治疗相关的不良事件。结论连续三个月口服单剂量的sarolaner(Simparica ?),剂量为2-4?mg / kg,连续三个月,耐受性良好,在澳大利亚各种田间条件下对跳蚤的自然侵染均具有出色的疗效包括不同的气候和住房条件。在第二和第三个月的治疗后,对多杀菌素(Comfortis ?)观察到相似的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号