首页> 外文期刊>Perioperative Medicine >Analgesic efficacy of continuous femoral nerve block commenced prior to operative fixation of fractured neck of femur
【24h】

Analgesic efficacy of continuous femoral nerve block commenced prior to operative fixation of fractured neck of femur

机译:股骨颈骨折手术固定前开始连续股神经阻滞的镇痛作用

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Peripheral nerve blocks are effective in treating acute pain, thereby minimizing the requirement for opiate analgesics. Fractured neck of femur (FNF) is a common, painful injury. The provision of effective analgesia to this cohort is challenging but an important determinant of their functional outcome. We investigated the analgesic efficacy of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) in patients with FNF. Methods Following institutional ethical approval and with informed consent, patients awaiting FNF surgery were randomly allocated to receive either standard opiate-based analgesia (Group 1) or a femoral perineural catheter (Group 2). Patients in Group 1 received parenteral morphine as required. Those in Group 2 received a CFNB comprising a bolus of local anaesthetic followed by a continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine. For both Groups, rescue analgesia consisted of intramuscular morphine as required and all patients received paracetamol regularly. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale at rest and during passive movement (dynamic pain score) at 30?min following first analgesic intervention and six hourly thereafter for 72 hours. Patient satisfaction with the analgesic regimen received was recorded using verbal rating scores (0-10). The primary outcome measured was dynamic pain score from initial analgesic intervention to 72 hours later. Results Of 27 recruited, 24 patients successfully completed the study protocol and underwent per protocol analysis. The intervals from recruitment to the study until surgery were similar in both groups [31.4(17.7) vs 27.5(14.2) h, P?=?0.57]. The groups were similar in terms of baseline clinical characteristics. For patients in Group 2, pain scores at rest were less than those reported by patients in Group 1 [9.5(9.4) vs 31(28), P?=?0.031]. Dynamic pain scores reported by patients in Group 2 were less at each time point from 30?min up to 54 hours [e.g at 6?h 30.7(23.4) vs 67.0(32.0), P?=?0.004]. Cumulative morphine consumption over 72?h was less in Group 2. Patient satisfaction scores were greater in Group 2 [9.4(1.1) vs 7.6(1.8), P?=?0.014]. Conclusions CFNB provides more effective perioperative analgesia than a standard opiate-based regimen for patients undergoing fixation of FNF. It is associated with lesser opiate use and greater patient satisfaction.
机译:背景技术周围神经阻滞可有效治疗急性疼痛,从而将鸦片类止痛药的需求降至最低。股骨颈骨折(FNF)是一种常见的疼痛性损伤。向该人群提供有效的镇痛具有挑战性,但是其功能结局的重要决定因素。我们调查了连续股神经阻滞(CFNB)在FNF患者中的镇痛效果。方法经机构伦理学批准并获得知情同意后,将等待FNF手术的患者随机分配接受基于阿片类药物的标准镇痛药(第1组)或股神经周导管(第2组)。第一组的患者根据需要接受肠胃外吗啡。第2组的患者接受CFNB,其中包括局部麻醉药,然后连续输注0.25%布比卡因。对于两组,急诊镇痛均根据需要由肌内吗啡组成,所有患者均定期接受扑热息痛。在第一次镇痛干预后30分钟,在静息时和被动运动过程中(动态疼痛评分),使用视觉模拟量表对疼痛进行评估,第一次镇痛干预后30分钟,之后每6小时一次,持续72小时。使用口头评分(0-10)记录患者对止痛方案的满意度。所测量的主要结局是从最初的镇痛干预到72小时后的动态疼痛评分。结果在新招募的27位患者中,有24位患者成功完成了研究方案并接受了方案分析。两组从招募到研究直至手术的间隔相似[31.4(17.7)vs 27.5(14.2)h,P≥0.57]。各组在基线临床特征方面相似。对于第2组患者,静止时的疼痛评分低于第1组患者所报告的评分[9.5(9.4)对31(28),P≥0.031]。第2组患者报告的动态疼痛评分从30分钟到54小时的每个时间点都较小(例如,在6小时时30.7(23.4)对67.0(32.0),P≥0.004)。在第2组中,超过72?h的吗啡累积消耗量较少,第2组中的患者满意度得分较高[9.4(1.1)对7.6(1.8),P≥0.014]。结论CFNB对FNF固定患者的围手术期镇痛效果优于基于鸦片的标准方案。它与减少鸦片使用和提高患者满意度有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号