...
首页> 外文期刊>Pastoralism >What is traditional pastoral farming? The politics of heritage and 'real values' in Swedish summer farms (f?bodbruk)
【24h】

What is traditional pastoral farming? The politics of heritage and 'real values' in Swedish summer farms (f?bodbruk)

机译:什么是传统的田园农业?瑞典夏季农场的遗产和“真实价值”政治(f?bodbruk)

获取原文

摘要

The number of pastoralists maintaining production systems with small numbers of traditional breeds of cattle decreased dramatically with the modernisation and industrialisation of agriculture in Europe during the twentieth century. While these pastoral systems were not compatible with agricultural industrialisation policies, they provide a far better match to current European Union (EU) policy with its emphasis on high nature values and various cultural heritage protection measures. Today, these farms can obtain EU funding for preserving natural and/or cultural heritage values rather than producing agricultural goods. Although such EU subsidies make a welcome contribution to the livelihood of traditional farmers, the critical definitions that have to be made regarding what is considered traditional or non-traditional can be problematic. This paper provides an example from Swedish f?bodbruk, a smallholder system of forest pasturing with traditional breeds of cattle, goats and sheep in northern Sweden. As policymaking and agricultural subsidies during the twentieth century reflected the contemporary political agenda of that time, farmers have been subjected to many changes in priority in political decision making. The contemporary push for traditional farming and heritage has made policymaking potentially even more difficult, e.g. as regards the question of what should be considered traditional and what makes up natural and cultural heritage. This paper examines how farmers are affected by valuations and assessments made by the relevant authorities on whether they are producing natural and/or cultural heritage.
机译:二十世纪,随着欧洲农业的现代化和工业化,以少数传统品种的牛维持生产系统的牧民人数急剧减少。虽然这些牧区制度与农业工业化政策不兼容,但它们以强调高自然价值和各种文化遗产保护措施为重点,与当前的欧盟(EU)政策相距甚远。如今,这些农场可以从欧盟获得资金来保护自然和/或文化遗产价值,而不是生产农产品。尽管此类欧盟补贴为传统农民的生计做出了令人欢迎的贡献,但对于被认为是传统还是非传统的食品,必须做出严格的定义却是有问题的。本文以瑞典的f?bodbruk为例,这是一个小农户,以瑞典北部传统牛,山羊和绵羊为品种的森林牧场系统。由于二十世纪的政策制定和农业补贴反映了当时的当代政治议程,农民在政治决策中的优先次序发生了许多变化。当代对传统农业和遗产的推动使政策制定变得更加困难,例如关于什么应该被认为是传统的以及什么构成自然和文化遗产的问题。本文研究了有关当局对农民是否生产自然和/或文化遗产进行的评估和评估,如何影响农民。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号