首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Health Information Management >Exploration of ICD-9-CM Coding of Chronic Disease within the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
【24h】

Exploration of ICD-9-CM Coding of Chronic Disease within the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

机译:慢性心力衰竭患者Elixhauser合并症措施中慢性病ICD-9-CM编码的探索

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes capture comorbidities that can be used to risk adjust nonrandom patient groups. We explored the accuracy of capturing comorbidities associated with one risk adjustment method, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure (ECM), in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) at one Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. We explored potential reasons for the differences found between the original codes assigned and conditions found through retrospective review.MethodsThis descriptive, retrospective study used a cohort of patients discharged with a principal diagnosis coded as CHF from one VA medical center in 2003. One admission per patient was used in the study; with multiple admissions, only the first admission was analyzed. We compared the assignment of original codes assigned to conditions found in a retrospective, manual review of the medical record conducted by an investigator with coding expertise as well as by physicians. Members of the team experienced with assigning ICD-9-CM codes and VA coding processes developed themes related to systemic reasons why chronic conditions were not coded in VA records using applied thematic techniques.ResultsIn the 181-patient cohort, 388 comorbid conditions were identified; 305 of these were chronic conditions, originally coded at the time of discharge with an average of 1.7 comorbidities related to the ECM per patient. The review by an investigator with coding expertise revealed a total of 937 comorbidities resulting in 618 chronic comorbid conditions with an average of 3.4 per patient; physician review found 872 total comorbidities with 562 chronic conditions (average 3.1 per patient). The agreement between the original and the retrospective coding review was 88 percent. The kappa statistic for the original and the retrospective coding review was 0.375 with a 95 percent confidence interval (CI) of 0.352 to 0.398. The kappa statistic for the retrospective coding review and physician review was 0.849 (CI, 0.823–0.875). The kappa statistic for the original coding and the physician review was 0.340 (CI, 0.316–0.364). Several systemic factors were identified, including familiarity with inpatient VA and non-VA guidelines, the quality of documentation, and operational requirements to complete the coding process within short time frames and to identify the reasons for movement within a given facility.ConclusionComorbidities within the ECM representing chronic conditions were significantly underrepresented in the original code assignment. Contributing factors potentially include prioritization of codes related to acute conditions over chronic conditions; coders’ professional training, educational level, and experience; and the limited number of codes allowed in initial coding software. This study highlights the need to evaluate systemic causes of underrepresentation of chronic conditions to improve the accuracy of risk adjustment used for health services research, resource allocation, and performance measurement.
机译:简介国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修改(ICD-9-CM)代码捕获可用于调整非随机患者组风险的合并症。我们在一家退伍军人事务(VA)医疗中心探讨了与一种风险调整方法(Elixhauser合并症测量(ECM))相关的合并症在患有慢性心力衰竭(CHF)的患者中的准确性。我们探讨了造成原始代码分配与通过回顾性检查发现的条件之间存在差异的潜在原因。方法该描述性,回顾性研究使用了2003年从一个VA医疗中心出院的主要诊断为CHF的患者队列。每位患者入院一次用于研究中;如果有多次录取,则仅分析第一次录取。我们比较了原始代码的分配与分配给条件的条件,这些条件是由具有编码专业知识的调查员以及医生对病历进行的回顾性手动审查。具有分配ICD-9-CM代码和VA编码过程经验的团队成员开发了与系统原因相关的主题,这些原因为何使用实用的主题技术无法在VA记录中编码慢性病。结果在181名患者的队列中,发现了388种合并症;其中305种是慢性疾病,最初在出院时编码,每位患者平均与ECM有关的合并症为1.7。由具有编码专业知识的研究人员进行的审查显示,总共937例合并症导致618例慢性合并症,平均每位患者3.4;医师审查发现872例合并症共562例慢性病(每位患者平均3.1例)。原始编码审核与追溯编码审核之间的协议为88%。原始和回顾性编码审查的kappa统计量为0.375,95%的置信区间(CI)为0.352至0.398。回顾性编码审查和医师审查的卡帕统计值为0.849(CI,0.823–0.875)。原始编码和医师审查的kappa统计量为0.340(CI,0.316-0.364)。确定了几个系统性因素,包括对住院VA和非VA指南的熟悉程度,文档质量以及在短时间内完成编码过程并确定给定设施内移动原因的操作要求。在原始代码分配中,代表慢性病的代表明显不足。造成这种情况的因素可能包括:与急性疾病相关的代码优先于慢性疾病;编码人员的专业培训,学历和经验;以及初始编码软件中允许的有限数量的代码。这项研究强调需要评估慢性病代表性不足的系统性原因,以提高用于卫生服务研究,资源分配和绩效评估的风险调整的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号