...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >A survey on glycemic control rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus with different therapies and patients’ satisfaction in China
【24h】

A survey on glycemic control rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus with different therapies and patients’ satisfaction in China

机译:中国不同疗法对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制率的调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To compare the blood glucose control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with different treatment methods, oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) monotherapy, insulin injection and combined therapy (OHA + insulin injection) and evaluate their satisfaction with the medical care. Methods: A total of 1512 T2DM patients were assessed, to compare the effects of different treatment methods on glycemic control in T2DM patients, the influencing factors of patients’ satisfaction with medical care measures and their relationship with glycemic control. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2?hrs postprandial plasma glucose (2hPG) and HbA1c were measured as the standard of the glycemic control. Satisfaction was defined using the simplified version of DAWN of chronic disease care patient scale (PACIC - DSF). Results: In this study, the FPG compliance rate, 2hPG compliance rate and HbA1c compliance rate were 25.5%, 22.7% and 19.5%, respectively. The differences in the glycemic control compliance rates of different treatment methods were not statistically significant. The total score of PACIC - DSF was 34.54±11.65( p 0.05), and the influencing factors included fast blood glucose (FBG) and 2hPG, 2hPG and PACIC - DSF were negatively correlated. Conclusions: The T2DM glycemic control rate in China is currently low. From the score of the PACIC - DSF, there is no significant difference in general satisfaction with medical care measures in different treatments. What is more, education level, occupation and exercise of patients with type 2 diabetes had influence on PACIC - DSF score. Different treatment methods have no influence on the glycemic control of patients with T2DM. FPG value and the 2hPG value are negative correlation with the satisfaction of patients in medical care measures.
机译:目的:比较不同治疗方法,口服降糖药(OHA)单药治疗,胰岛素注射和联合治疗(OHA +胰岛素注射)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖控制,并评估他们对医疗的满意度。方法:共评估1512名T2DM患者,比较不同治疗方法对T2DM患者血糖控制的影响,患者对医疗措施满意度的影响因素及其与血糖控制的关系。测定空腹血糖(FPG),餐后2小时血糖(2hPG)和HbA1c作为血糖对照的标准。使用慢性疾病护理患者量表的DAWN简化版本(PACIC-DSF)定义满意度。结果:在这项研究中,FPG依从率,2hPG依从率和HbA1c依从率分别为25.5%,22.7%和19.5%。不同治疗方法的血糖控制依从率差异无统计学意义。 PACIC-DSF的总评分为34.54±11.65(p> 0.05),影响因素包括快速血糖(FBG)和2hPG,2hPG与PACIC-DSF呈负相关。结论:目前中国的T2DM血糖控制率较低。从PACIC-DSF的得分来看,不同治疗方法对医疗措施的总体满意度没有显着差异。此外,2型糖尿病患者的文化程度,职业和运动对PACIC-DSF评分有影响。不同的治疗方法对T2DM患者的血糖控制没有影响。 FPG值和2hPG值与医疗措施中患者的满意度呈负相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号