首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >Impact of telephonic interviews on persistence and daily adherence to insulin treatment in insulin-na?ve type 2 diabetes patients: dropout study
【24h】

Impact of telephonic interviews on persistence and daily adherence to insulin treatment in insulin-na?ve type 2 diabetes patients: dropout study

机译:电话采访对初次接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的坚持和每日坚持胰岛素治疗的影响:辍学研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of sequential telephonic interviews on treatment persistence and daily adherence to insulin injections among insulin-na?ve type 2 diabetes patients initiated on different insulin regimens in a 3-month period. Methods: A total of 1,456 insulin-na?ve patients with type 2 diabetes (mean [standard deviation, SD] age: 56.0 [12.0]?years, 49.1% were females) initiated on insulin therapy and consecutively randomized to sequential (n=733) and single (n=723) telephonic interview groups were included. Data on insulin treatment and self-reported blood glucose values were obtained via telephone interview. Logistic regression analysis was performed for factors predicting increased likelihood of persistence and skipping an injection. Results: Overall, 76.8% patients (83.2% in sequential vs 70.3% in single interview group, ( P <0.001) remained on insulin treatment at the third month. Significantly higher rate for skipping doses was noted in basal bolus than in other regimens (27.0% vs 15.0% for premixed and 15.8% basal insulin, respectively, P <0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed sequential telephonic interview (odds ratio [OR], 1.531; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.093–2.143; P =0.013), higher hemoglobin A1c levels (OR, 1.090; 95% CI, 0.999–1.189; P =0.049), and less negative appraisal of insulin therapy as significant predictors of higher persistence. Basal bolus regimen (OR, 1.583; 95% CI, 1.011–2.479; P =0.045) and higher hemoglobin A1c levels (OR, 1.114; 95% CI, 1.028–1.207; P =0.008) were the significant predictors of increased likelihood of skipping an injection. Conclusion: Our findings revealed positive influence of sequential telephonic interview, although including no intervention in treatment, on achieving better treatment persistence in type 2 diabetes patients initiating insulin.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估在3个月内开始采用不同胰岛素治疗方案的初治2型糖尿病初治2型糖尿病患者中,连续电话访谈对治疗持续性和每日坚持注射胰岛素的影响。方法:共有1,456名初次接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病初生患者(平均[标准差,SD]年龄:56.0 [12.0]?岁,女性占49.1%),开始接受胰岛素治疗,并随机分为顺序(n = 733)和单个(n = 723)电话访问小组。通过电话采访获得有关胰岛素治疗和自我报告的血糖值的数据。对预测持久性可能性增加和跳过注射的因素进行了逻辑回归分析。结果:总体而言,第三个月仍接受胰岛素治疗的患者为76.8%(顺序治疗组为83.2%,单次访谈组为70.3%,(P <0.001)。基础推注的跳过剂量率明显高于其他方案(预混胰岛素和基础胰岛素分别为27.0%和15.0%,基础胰岛素为15.8%,P <0.0001)。Logistic回归分析显示了连续电话访谈(优势比[OR]为1.531; 95%置信区间[CI]为1.093-2.143; P = 0.013),较高的血红蛋白A1c水平(OR,1.090; 95%CI,0.999-1.189; P = 0.049),以及对胰岛素治疗的阴性评估较少,这是持久性较高的重要预测指标。基础推注方案(OR,1.583; 95%CI ,1.011–2.479; P = 0.045)和更高的血红蛋白A1c水平(OR,1.114; 95%CI,1.028–1.207; P = 0.008)是跳过注射可能性增加的重要预测指标。电话采访,尽管不包括治疗干预,在开始使用胰岛素的2型糖尿病患者中获得更好的治疗持久性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号