...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Clinical Research >A prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing epidural butorphanol plus corticosteroid with corticosteroid alone for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus
【24h】

A prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing epidural butorphanol plus corticosteroid with corticosteroid alone for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus

机译:一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,对照的临床试验,比较了硬膜外but门烷酚和皮质类固醇与单独使用皮质类固醇治疗因髓核突出引起的坐骨神经痛

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To compare the efficacy of up to 3 epidural butorphanol plus corticosteroid with corticosteroid alone for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial, we administered up to 3 epidural injections of either 80 mg (2 mL) of methylprednisolone acetate and 1 mg (1 mL) of butorphanol diluted with 7 mL of isotonic saline or 80 mg (2 mL) of methylprednisolone acetate diluted with 8 mL of isotonic saline by a lumbar interlaminar approach under fluoroscopic guidance to 120 patients (60 patients in each group) with sciatica due to a herniated nucleus pulposus lasting for 4 weeks to 1 year. All patients had scores higher than 30 mm on visual analog scale (VAS). Information on the use of paracetamol, intensity of pain on a VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain possible), Schober's test (cm), Straight Leg Raising test, neurologic examination assessing sensory deficits, motor deficits and reflex changes, and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire were evaluated at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after the first injection. Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to baseline characteristics, withdrawals, and complication rate. Three weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after the first injection, all the outcome measures in the butorphanol plus corticosteroid group were significantly different from that of the corticosteroid group. Conclusions: Epidural butorphanol plus corticosteroid injections, as compared with corticosteroid alone injections, offered marked improvement in pain, reflex, motor and sensory deficits, and functional status and reduced the need for analgesics. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I.
机译:目的:比较多达3种硬膜外布托啡诺联合皮质类固醇与单独使用皮质类固醇治疗因髓核突出引起的坐骨神经痛的疗效。材料和方法:在一项随机,双盲对照的临床试验中,我们最多进行了3次硬膜外注射,分别用80 mg(2 mL)的甲基强的松龙乙酸酯和1 mg(1 mL)的丁烷醇用7 mL等渗盐水稀释或由于腰椎间盘突出症持续4周至1年,通过腰椎间盘入路在荧光镜引导下将80 mg(2 mL)的醋酸甲基泼尼松龙用8 mL等渗盐水稀释至120例坐骨神经痛(每组60例)的坐骨神经痛患者。所有患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)得分均高于30毫米。有关扑热息痛的使用,VAS上的疼痛强度范围从0(无疼痛)到100 mm(可能是最严重的疼痛),Schober测试(厘米),直腿抬高测试,神经系统检查(评估感觉缺陷,运动缺陷和反射)的信息首次注射后3周,6周和3个月,对Oswestry腰背痛残疾问卷进行了评估。结果:两组在基线特征,戒断和并发症发生率方面无显着差异。首次注射后3周,6周和3个月,布托啡诺+皮质类固醇组的所有结局指标均与皮质类固醇组明显不同。结论:与单独使用皮质类固醇激素注射相比,硬膜外注射布托啡诺+皮质类固醇激素注射可以显着改善疼痛,反射,运动和感觉缺陷以及功能状态,并减少了对止痛药的需求。证据级别:治疗级别I。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号