首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >Methodological considerations of investigating adherence to using offloading devices among people with diabetes
【24h】

Methodological considerations of investigating adherence to using offloading devices among people with diabetes

机译:研究糖尿病患者对使用减负装置的依从性的方法学考虑

获取原文
       

摘要

Foot ulcers are a diabetic complication associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and amputation risk. Offloading devices prevent and heal foot ulcers, but adherence to using these devices is low. The reasons for nonadherence are unclear, and study results are difficult to compare due to methodological heterogeneity. This paper explores aspects of investigating adherence to using offloading devices among people with diabetes and provides recommendations for future studies, focusing on study designs, definitions of adherence, measurement methods, and conceptual frameworks. Most studies use a cross-sectional observational study design, limiting the potential to establish the temporal sequence between predictors and adherence, rule out confounding factors, and establish causality. Studies defining adherence as the length of time the device is worn have often used self-report to measure adherence, which may be unreliable. Studies using activity monitors to measure adherence have defined adherence as the number of steps taken with the device, which excludes weight-bearing activities where no steps are taken. Conceptual frameworks are not made explicit in the current quantitative research. It is concluded that future studies should use a longitudinal design with observational studies to identify patient groups prone to nonadherence and factors that influence adherence and experimental studies to evaluate interventions to improve adherence, focusing on these patient groups and factors. Furthermore, adherence should be defined in terms of relative adherence to using offloading devices during all weight-bearing activities, and objective measurement of adherence (using accelerometers and temperature monitors) should be used whenever possible. Clearly defined conceptual frameworks should guide the choice of factors to include in the study and the analysis of their interactions. By implementing these recommendations, research could provide a stronger evidence base in the future, supporting interventions to increase adherence and thereby improve outcomes for people with diabetic foot complications.
机译:足溃疡是糖尿病并发症,伴有明显的发病率,死亡率和截肢风险。卸载设备可以预防和治愈足部溃疡,但是使用这些设备的依从性较低。不坚持的原因尚不清楚,由于方法的异质性,研究结果难以比较。本文探讨了在糖尿病患者中研究使用减负装置的依从性的各个方面,并为未来的研究提供了建议,重点在于研究设计,依从性的定义,测量方法和概念框架。大多数研究使用横断面观察研究设计,限制了建立预测变量和依从性之间的时间顺序,排除混淆因素和建立因果关系的潜力。将依从性定义为佩戴设备的时间长度的研究经常使用自我报告来测量依从性,这可能是不可靠的。使用活动监视器测量依从性的研究已将依从性定义为使用设备采取的步骤数,其中不包括不采取任何步骤的负重活动。在当前的定量研究中,概念框架尚未明确。结论是,未来的研究应采用纵向设计和观察性研究,以识别易发生不依从性的患者组和影响依从性的因素,并进行实验性研究以评估改善依从性的干预措施,重点是这些患者组和因素。此外,应根据在所有负重活动中使用卸载设备的相对依从性来定义依从性,并应尽可能客观地测量依从性(使用加速度计和温度监控器)。明确定义的概念框架应指导选择要纳入研究和对其相互作用的分析的因素。通过实施这些建议,研究可以为将来提供更强大的证据基础,支持干预措施以增加依从性,从而改善糖尿病足并发症患者的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号