...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >Targeted drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a network meta-analysis of 32 randomized clinical trials
【24h】

Targeted drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a network meta-analysis of 32 randomized clinical trials

机译:肺动脉高压的靶向药物:32项随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a devastating disease and ultimately leads to right heart failure and premature death. A total of four classical targeted drugs, prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE-5Is), and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator (sGCS), have been proved to improve exercise capacity and hemodynamics compared to placebo; however, direct head-to-head comparisons of these drugs are lacking. This network meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively compare the efficacy of these targeted drugs for PAH. Methods: Medline, the Cochrane Library, and other Internet sources were searched for randomized clinical trials exploring the efficacy of targeted drugs for patients with PAH. The primary effective end point of this network meta-analysis was a 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Results: Thirty-two eligible trials including 6,758 patients were identified. There was a statistically significant improvement in 6MWD, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and clinical worsening events associated with each of the four targeted drugs compared with placebo. Combination therapy improved 6MWD by 20.94 m (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.94, 34.94; P =0.003) vs prostanoids, and 16.94 m (95% CI: 4.41, 29.47; P =0.008) vs ERAs. PDE-5Is improved 6MWD by 17.28 m (95% CI: 1.91, 32.65; P =0.028) vs prostanoids, with a similar result with combination therapy. In addition, combination therapy reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure by 3.97 mmHg (95% CI: -6.06, -1.88; P <0.001) vs prostanoids, 8.24 mmHg (95% CI: -10.71, -5.76; P <0.001) vs ERAs, 3.38 mmHg (95% CI:?-6.30, -0.47; P =0.023) vs PDE-5Is, and 3.94 mmHg (95% CI: -6.99, -0.88; P =0.012) vs sGCS. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality and severe adverse events between prostanoids, ERAs, PDE-5Is, sGCS, combination therapy, and placebo. Conclusion: All targeted drugs for PAH are associated with improved clinical outcomes, especially combination therapy. However, all these drugs seem to show less favorable effects on survival in the short-term follow-up, suggesting further clinical trials are required.
机译:背景:肺动脉高压(PAH)是一种破坏性疾病,最终导致右心衰竭和过早死亡。事实证明,与安慰剂相比,总共四种经典的靶向药物,前列腺素,内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERAs),磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂(PDE-5Is)和可溶性鸟苷酸环化酶刺激剂(sGCS)可以改善运动能力和血液动力学。然而,这些药物缺乏直接的正面对比。进行该网络荟萃分析以全面比较这些靶向药物对PAH的疗效。方法:在Medline,Cochrane图书馆和其他Internet来源中搜索随机临床试验,以探讨靶向药物对PAH患者的疗效。该网络荟萃分析的主要有效终点是6分钟的步行距离(6MWD)。结果:确定了32项合格试验,包括6,758名患者。与安慰剂相比,四种靶向药物各自的6MWD,平均肺动脉压,肺血管阻力和临床恶化事件在统计学上均有显着改善。与前列腺素相比,联合疗法可使6MWD改善20.94 m(95%置信区间[CI]:6.94,34.94; P = 0.003),对ERAs改善16.94 m(95%CI:4.41,29.47; P = 0.008)。与前列腺素类药物相比,PDE-5I使6MWD改善了17.28 m(95%CI:1.91,32.65; P = 0.028),与联合疗法的结果相似。此外,与前列腺素相比,联合疗法使平均肺动脉压降低了3.97 mmHg(95%CI:-6.06,-1.88; P <0.001),与ERAs相比降低了8.24 mmHg(95%CI:-10.71,-5.76; P <0.001) ,相对于PDE-5Is,分别为3.38mmHg(95%CI:?-6.30,-0.47; P = 0.023)和相对于sGCS 3.94 mmHg(95%CI:-6.99,-0.88; P = 0.012)。前列腺素,ERAs,PDE-5Is,sGCS,联合治疗和安慰剂之间的全因死亡率和严重不良事件之间无显着差异。结论:所有针对PAH的靶向药物均可以改善临床疗效,尤其是联合治疗。但是,所有这些药物在短期随访中似乎均未显示出对生存的有利影响,这表明需要进一步的临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号