首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Comparison of effectiveness and cost of patent ductusarteriosus device occlusion versus surgical ligationof patent ductus arteriosus
【24h】

Comparison of effectiveness and cost of patent ductusarteriosus device occlusion versus surgical ligationof patent ductus arteriosus

机译:动脉导管未闭装置与手术结扎方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: Comparison of effectiveness and cost of transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with surgical ligation of PDA.Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted in the pediatric cardiology department of Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology Multan, Pakistan. Data of 250 patients who underwent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure either surgical or trans-catheter closure using SHSMA Occluder having weight >5 kg from April 2012 to October 2015 were included in this study. SPSS version 20 was used for data analysis. Quantitative variables were compared using independent sample t-test. Chi-square test and fishers exact was used for qualitative variables. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: There were one hundred and twenty (120) patients who underwent transcatheter occlusion of PDA using SHSMA occluder (PDA Device Group) and one hundred and thirty (130) patients who underwent surgical ligation of PDA (Surgical Group). Incidence of residual shunting was two (1.5%) in surgical group and 0 (0.0%) in PDA Device group for one month follow up period. There were 4 (3.1%) major complications in surgical group. The rate of blood transfusions were high in surgical group (p-value 0.04). Hospital stay time was significantly less in PDA Device group (P-value <0.001). Total procedural cost was 110695+1054 Pakistani rupees in PDA Device group and 92414+3512 in surgical group (p-value <0.001). The cost of PDA device closure was 16.52% higher than the surgical ligation of PDA. There was no operative mortality.Conclusion: The transcatheter closure of PDA is an effective and less invasive method as compared to the surgical ligation. There is a lower rate of complications and the cost is not much high as compared to surgical PDA ligation.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10048How to cite this:Zulqarnain A, Younas M, Waqar T, Beg A, Asma T, Baig MAR. Comparison of effectiveness and cost of patent ductus arteriosus device occlusion versus surgical ligation of patent ductus arteriosus. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(4):974-977. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10048This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:目的:比较动脉导管未闭(PDA)和经外科手术结扎的经导管闭塞的有效性和成本。方法:这项回顾性比较研究在中国小儿心脏病科进行。巴基斯坦木尔坦Pervaiz Elahi心脏病研究所。该研究纳入了2012年4月至2015年10月使用体重> 5 kg的SHSMA阻塞器对250例行动脉导管未闭(PDA)手术或经导管封闭的患者的数据。 SPSS版本20用于数据分析。使用独立样本t检验比较定量变量。卡方检验和费舍尔精确度用于定性变量。 P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:共有120(120)例患者使用SHSMA阻塞器(PDA Device Group)进行了PDA的经导管闭塞,而130(130)例患者接受了手术结扎术。 PDA(手术组)。术后一个月的随访期间,手术组残余分流的发生率为2(1.5%),PDA设备组为0(0.0%)。手术组有4例(3.1%)主要并发症。手术组的输血率很高(p值0.04)。 PDA设备组的住院时间显着减少(P值<0.001)。 PDA设备组的总手术成本为110695 + 1054巴基斯坦卢比,外科手术组的总手术成本为92414 + 3512(p值<0.001)。 PDA结扎的费用比PDA的手术结扎高出16.52%。结论:与手术结扎相比,经导管闭合PDA是一种有效且侵入性较小的方法。与外科PDA结扎术相比,并发症的发生率较低,费用也不高。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10048 T,乞eg A,阿斯玛T,拜格3月。动脉导管未闭装置闭塞与手术结扎动脉导管未闭的有效性和成本的比较。朴J医学。 2016; 32(4):974-977。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.10048这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款分发的开放访问文章,只要适当引用了原始作品,便可以在任何介质中不受限制地使用,分发和复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号