首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >The impact of adherence and disease control on resource use and charges in patients with mild asthma managed on inhaled corticosteroid agents
【24h】

The impact of adherence and disease control on resource use and charges in patients with mild asthma managed on inhaled corticosteroid agents

机译:吸入性糖皮质激素治疗对轻度哮喘患者依从性和疾病控制对资源使用和费用的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Inadequate asthma control may affect asthma resource use and treatment charges, consequently contributing to the growing economic burden of asthma. The study objective was to determine the impact of medication adherence and asthma control on resource use and charges in mild asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs).Research design and methods: A claims database was analyzed retrospectively from October 2001–December 2007 to identify mild asthmatic patients aged 12–65 years who began ICS treatment. Demographics, drug utilization, and resource use for each patient were identified for the 365-day period before and after the index date (pre-index and post-index periods, respectively). Patients were designated as having high control high adherence (HCHA) or low control low adherence (LCLA) based on post-index exacerbations and the percentage of days covered; not all patients who qualified for study inclusion met adherence designation requirements. Differences between the HCHA and LCLA cohorts in resource use (eg, asthma treatment days) and asthma-related treatment charges were assessed.Results: Compared with the HCHA cohort (n = 483), the LCLA cohort (n = 258) had more asthma treatment days (2.9 vs 3.9, respectively; P < 0.0001) and higher overall asthma treatment charges ($2655 vs $3345, respectively; P < 0.0001) in the post-index period. An adjusted odds ratio suggested that patients receiving mometasone furoate (MF) were approximately 5 times more likely to belong to the HCHA cohort than patients receiving any other ICS (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: Better asthma control and adherence to prescribed ICSs are associated with lower asthma-related resource use and charges. Mild asthmatic patients receiving MF were more likely to be in the HCHA cohort than patients receiving other ICSs, perhaps due to the once-daily dosing of MF. Current NAEPP guidelines recommend low-dose ICS monotherapy for mild persistent asthma; thus, it is critical to optimize mild persistent asthma control and limit unnecessary resource use and charges.
机译:目的:哮喘控制不力可能会影响哮喘资源的使用和治疗费用,从而加剧哮喘的经济负担。研究目的是确定药物依从性和哮喘控制对吸入性糖皮质激素(ICSs)治疗的轻度哮喘患者的资源使用和费用的影响。研究设计和方法:对2001年10月至2007年12月期间的索赔数据库进行了回顾性分析,以确定开始ICS治疗的12-65岁的轻度哮喘患者。在索引日期之前和之后的365天期间(分别为索引前和索引后期间),确定了每个患者的人口统计学,药物利用和资源使用情况。根据指数后恶化和所涵盖天数的百分比,将患者指定为高对照高依从性(HCHA)或低对照低依从性(LCLA)。并非所有符合纳入研究条件的患者都符合依从性指定要求。评估了HCHA和LCLA队列在资源使用(例如哮喘治疗天数)和哮喘相关治疗费用方面的差异。结果:与HCHA队列(n = 483)相比,LCLA队列(n = 258)有更多的哮喘指数后时期的治疗天数(分别为2.9天和3.9天; P <0.0001)和更高的总体哮喘治疗费用(分别为2655美元和3345美元; P <0.0001)。校正后的优势比表明,​​接受糠酸莫米松(MF)的患者比接受其他ICS的患者发生HCHA队列的可能性高约5倍(P <0.0001)。降低与哮喘相关的资源使用和费用。接受MF的轻度哮喘患者比接受其他ICS的患者更有可能参与HCHA队列研究,这可能是由于MF每天一次的剂量。当前的NAEPP指南建议低剂量ICS单药治疗轻度持续哮喘。因此,优化轻度持续哮喘控制并限制不必要的资源使用和费用至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号