首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Cryoablation for the Treatment of Occipital Neuralgia
【24h】

Cryoablation for the Treatment of Occipital Neuralgia

机译:冷冻消融治疗枕神经痛

获取原文
       

摘要

Treatment of occipital neuralgia (ON) can be complex, though many treatment options exist. Cryoablation (CA) is an interventional modality that has been used successfully in chronic neuropathic conditions and is one such option. OBJECTIVE: To study and evaluate the efficacy and safety of cryoablation for treatment of ON.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation.SETTING: Academic university-based pain management center.METHODS: All patients received local anesthetic injections for ON. Patients with greater than or equal to 50% relief and less than 2 week duration of relief were treated with CA.RESULTS: Thirty-eight pateitns with an average age of 49.6 years were included. Of the 38 patients, 20 were treated for unilateral greater ON, 10 for unilateral greater and lesser ON, and 8 for bilateral greater ON. There were 10 men and 28 women, with an average age of 45.2 years and 51.1 years, respectively. The average relief for all local anesthetic injections was 71.2%, 58.3% for patients who reported 50 – 74% relief (Group 1) and 82.75% for patients who reported greater than 75% relief (Group 2). The average improvement of pain relief with CA was 57.9% with an average duration of 6.1 months overall. Group 1 reported an average of 45.2% relief for an average of 4.1 months with CA. In comparison, Group 2 reported an average of 70.5% relief for 8.1 months. The percentage of relief (P = 0.007) and duration of relief (P = 0.0006) was significantly improved in those reporting at least 75% relief of pain with local anesthetic injections (Group 2 vs Group 1). Though no significance in improvement from CA was found in men, significance was seen in women with at least 75% benefit with local anesthetic injections in terms of duration (P = 0.03) and percentage (P = 0.001) of pain relief with CA. The average pain score prior to CA was 8 (0 – 10 visual analog scale, VAS), this improved to 4.2, improvement of 3.8 following CA at 6 months (P = 0.03). Of the 38 patients, 3 (7.8%) adverse effects were seen. Two patients reported post procedure neuritis and one was monitored for procedure-related hematoma. LIMITATIONS: Study limitations include the retrospective nature of the study. Additionally, only the percentage of relief, pain score, and duration of relief were collected. CONCLUSIONS: CA is safe, and should be considered in patients with ON.
机译:枕神经痛(ON)的治疗可能很复杂,尽管存在许多治疗选择。冷冻消融(CA)是一种已在慢性神经性疾病中成功使用的干预方式,也是其中一种选择。目的:研究和评估冷冻消融治疗ON的疗效和安全性。研究设计:回顾性评估。地点:大学学术疼痛管理中心。方法:所有患者均接受局麻药注射。结果:包括38例平均年龄为49.6岁的患者,其缓解程度大于或等于50%且缓解持续时间少于2周。在38例患者中,有20例接受了单侧更大ON的治疗,有10例接受了单侧更大和较小的ON的治疗,还有8例接受了双侧更大ON的治疗。男10例,女28例,平均年龄分别为45.2岁和51.1岁。所有局部麻醉剂注射的平均缓解率分别为71.2%,报告50-74%缓解的患者(组1)的58.3%和报告大于75%缓解的患者(组2)的82.75%。 CA缓解疼痛的平均改善率为57.9%,平均持续时间为6.1个月。第一组报告称,CA缓解平均4.1个月,平均缓解45.2%。相比之下,第2组报告的8.1个月平均缓解率为70.5%。报告局部麻醉剂至少缓解疼痛75%的患者(组2与组1)的缓解百分比(P = 0.007)和缓解持续时间(P = 0.0006)显着提高。尽管在男性中没有发现改善CA的意义,但是在使用CA缓解疼痛的持续时间(P = 0.03)和缓解百分比(P = 0.001)方面,至少有75%的女性在局部麻醉注射中获益显着。 CA之前的平均疼痛评分为8(0-10视觉模拟量表,VAS),改善至4.2,6个月后CA改善了3.8(P = 0.03)。在38例患者中,观察到3例(7.8%)不良反应。两名患者报告了术后神经炎,并对一名患者进行了与手术相关的血肿监测。局限性:研究局限性包括研究的回顾性。此外,仅收集缓解的百分比,疼痛评分和缓解的持续时间。结论:CA是安全的,ON患者应考虑使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号