...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy as compared to bimanual therapy in upper motor function outcome in child with hemiplegic cerebral palsy
【24h】

Effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy as compared to bimanual therapy in upper motor function outcome in child with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

机译:约束诱导运动疗法与双向疗法相比对偏瘫性脑瘫患儿上运动功能结局的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: This study aims at determining the effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy as compared to bimanual therapy for improving functional status in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.Methods: This study was a randomized control trial, children (n = 20) with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy was randomly allocated to CIMT (constraint induced movement therapy) and BMT (bimanual therapy) group. The children with spastic hemiplegia, age between 1.5 and 12 year and having 10 degrees of wrist extension and 10 degrees of finger extension were included in study. Treatment regime was two hours of daily training six days a week for two weeks. Constraint was applied to CIMT group for six hours. The outcome tool QUEST was used for baseline and post treatment assessment.Result: CIMT had superior outcome as compared to BMT in improving functional status (p=0.007). On QUEST tool grasp and dissociated movements results were significant (p=0.005) and (p=0.028) respectively. Weight bearing and protective extension resulted in no significant outcome (p=0.080) and (p=0.149) respectively. Dissociated movements and grasp are significantly improved but there is no difference for weight bearing and protective extension in CIMT treated group as compared to BMT treated group.Conclusion: CIMT approach is better in improving functional status of child with cerebral palsy as compared to BMT. Significant improvement in grasp and dissociated movement is noted in group of CIMT while there was no significant improvement in weight bearing and protective extension in CIMT group when compared to BMT. CIMT is considered the appropriate treatment approach for unilateral conditions while BMT for bilateral conditions.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8491How to cite this:Zafer H, Amjad I, Malik AN, Shaukat E. Effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy as compared to bimanual therapy in upper motor function outcome in child with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(1):181-184. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8491This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:目的:本研究旨在确定约束诱导运动疗法与双手疗法相比对改善偏瘫性脑瘫患儿功能状态的有效性。方法:本研究是一项随机对照试验,n = 20的儿童为痉挛性偏瘫性脑瘫。麻痹被随机分为CIMT(约束诱导运动疗法)和BMT(双手疗法)组。患有痉挛性偏瘫的儿童,年龄在1.5至12岁之间,腕部伸展度为10度,手指伸展度为10度。治疗方案为每周两天,每天六天的两个小时的每日训练。将约束应用于CIMT组六个小时。结果工具QUEST用于基线和治疗后评估。结果:与BMT相比,CIMT在改善功能状态方面有更好的结果(p = 0.007)。在QUEST工具上,抓取和分离运动的结果分别很明显(p = 0.005)和(p = 0.028)。负重和保护性伸展分别无明显结果(p = 0.080)和(p = 0.149)。与BMT治疗组相比,CIMT治疗组的离体运动和抓握力得到显着改善,但在负重和保护性伸展方面没有差异。结论:CIMT方案较BMT更好地改善了脑瘫儿童的功能状态。与BMT相比,CIMT组的抓地力和离解运动明显改善,而CIMT组的负重和保护性伸展没有明显改善。 CIMT被认为是单方面疾病的适当治疗方法,而BMT是双边疾病的适当治疗方法。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8491如何引用这一点:Zafer H,Amjad I,Malik AN,Shaukat E.与双向疗法相比,约束性运动疗法对偏瘫性脑瘫患儿上运动功能结局的有效性。朴J医学。 2016; 32(1):181-184。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8491这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款分发的开放获取文章。只要适当引用了原始作品,便可以在任何介质中不受限制地使用,分发和复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号