...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >How to deal with burden of critical illness: A comparison of strategies in different areas of China
【24h】

How to deal with burden of critical illness: A comparison of strategies in different areas of China

机译:如何应对重症疾病负担:中国不同地区策略的比较

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: This article aims to introduce, compare and analyze the design and development of Critical Illness Insurance systems in different parts of China under different social and economic conditions, to explain their characteristics and similarities. It may provide references to other countries, especially developing countries, to solve the problem of high medical costs.Methods: According to the methods in Comparative Economics, 3 areas (Taicang in Jiangsu, Zhanjiang in Guangdong, Xunyi in Shanxi) which are in high, medium and low socio-economic condition respectively were chosen in China. Their critical illness insurance systems were analyzed in the study.Results: Each system shares several common points, including coordinating urban and rural medical insurance fund, financing from the basic medical insurance surplus, and exploring payment reform and so on. But in the way of management, Taicang and Zhanjiang cooperate with commercial insurance agencies, but Xunyi chooses autonomous management by government. In Xunyi, multi-channel financing is relatively more dispersed, while funds of Taicang and Zhanjiang are mainly from the basic medical insurance surplus. The specific method of payment is different among these three areas.Conclusion: Because of the differences in economic development, population structure, and sources of funds, each area took their own mode on health policy orientation, financing, payment, coverage, and fund management to design their Critical Illness Insurance systems. This might provide references to other areas in China and other developing countries in the world.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.303.4600How to cite this:Liu P, Jiang L, Li C, Sun M, Rieger A, Hao M. How to deal with burden of critical illness: A comparison of strategies in different areas of China. Pak J Med Sci 2014;30(3):659-663. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.303.4600This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:目的:本文旨在介绍,比较和分析中国不同地区在不同社会和经济条件下的重大疾病保险系统的设计和开发,以说明其特征和相似性。方法:根据比较经济学的方法,将江苏省太仓市,广东湛江市,山西旬义市3个地区的医疗费用较高。在中国,分别选择了中,低社会经济条件。结果:每个系统具有几个共同点,包括统筹城乡医疗保险基金,从基本医疗保险盈余中筹集资金,探索支付改革等。但是在管理方式上,太仓和湛江与商业保险机构合作,但遵义选择政府自主管理。在遵义,多渠道筹资相对分散,而太仓和湛江的资金主要来自基本医疗保险盈余。这三个领域的具体支付方式有所不同。结论:由于经济发展,人口结构和资金来源的差异,每个地区在卫生政策取向,筹资,支付,覆盖范围和资金管理方面采取了各自的模式。设计他们的危疾保险系统。这可能会为中国和世界其他发展中国家的其他地区提供参考。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.303.4600如何引用此信息:刘萍,姜琳,李丙,孙敏,Rieger A,Hao M.如何应对重症疾病负担:中国不同地区策略的比较。 Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30(3):659-663。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.303.4600这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款分发的开放访问文章,只要适当引用了原始作品,便可以在任何介质中不受限制地使用,分发和复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号