首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Comparison of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream with dorsal penile nerve block using lignocaine for circumcision in infants
【24h】

Comparison of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream with dorsal penile nerve block using lignocaine for circumcision in infants

机译:利诺卡因对婴幼儿包皮环切术局部麻醉药乳膏与阴茎背神经阻滞的共晶混合物的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Circumcision is a commonly performed surgical procedure but choice of anesthesia remained an issue of research and debate. This study was conducted to find out the effectiveness of the eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream with dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) using lignocaine, for reduction of pain during circumcision. Methodology: This was comparative study carried out in Surgical Unit B of National Institute of Child Health Karachi, from May 2008 to October 2008. Patients under six month of age were randomized in to two groups (EMLA and DPNB) of fifty patients each. The effectiveness of pain control was assessed by measuring the baseline heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and Neonatal infant Pain Scale (NIPS scale) before the start of procedure and measuring of these parameters for each step of circumcision. Independent sample t -test was used to compare means and repeated ANOVA was used to compare means of HR, RR, oxygen (O2) saturations and NIPS. Results: The mean age in both the groups was 2.3 months. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline parameters in both the groups except the respiratory rate, which was significantly raised in DPNB group (33 breaths/min in EMLA and 38 in DPNB P < 0.04). During circumcision there was significant increase in heart rate in DPNB group, especially in step three and step four (p < 0.04). Oxygen saturation dropped in both the groups (baseline saturation 98% up to 91% in step 4). While assessing NIPS scores in both the groups, statistically significant difference was found between NIPS at step two and step four in two groups (p < 0.04). Conclusions: The overall pain control was equal in both the groups, although NIPS score was higher in DPNB in step two and four of circumcision. There was difference in application and cost. EMLA was easy to apply but has increased cost; while DPNB required expertise
机译:目的:包皮环切术是一种常用的手术方法,但是麻醉的选择仍然是研究和辩论的问题。进行这项研究以发现使用利多卡因的局部麻醉药(EMLA)乳膏与阴茎背神经阻滞(DPNB)的共晶混合物对减轻包皮环切术的疼痛的有效性。方法:这项比较研究于2008年5月至2008年10月在卡拉奇国立儿童健康研究所的外科B室进行。六个月以下的患者随机分为两组,每组50名患者(EMLA和DPNB)。通过在开始手术前测量基线心率(HR),呼吸频率(RR)和新生儿婴儿疼痛量表(NIPS量表),并在包皮环切的每个步骤中测量这些参数,来评估疼痛控制的有效性。使用独立样本t检验比较均值,并使用重复ANOVA比较HR,RR,氧(O2)饱和度和NIPS的均值。结果:两组的平均年龄为2.3个月。除呼吸频率外,两组的基线参数均无统计学差异(DPNB组显着升高(EMLA为33次/ min,DPNB为38次/ min,P <0.04))。包皮环切术期间,DPNB组的心率显着增加,尤其是在第三步和第四步中(p <0.04)。两组的氧饱和度均下降(基线饱和度从98%上升到步骤4中的91%)。在评估两组的NIPS分数时,两组的第二步和第四步的NIPS之间存在统计学上的显着差异(p <0.04)。结论:两组的总体疼痛控制均相同,尽管在包皮环切术的第二步和第四步,DPNB中的NIPS评分较高。申请和费用有所不同。 EMLA易于应用,但成本增加;而DPNB需要专业知识

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号