...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Is it necessary to invaginate the stump after appendicectomy?
【24h】

Is it necessary to invaginate the stump after appendicectomy?

机译:阑尾切除术后是否需要使残端内陷?

获取原文

摘要

Objective: To compare the technique of simple ligation of the appendix with ligation and burial of the stump during appendicectomy for acute appendicitis. Design: A comparative study of 677 appendicectomies. Place and duration of study: Department of General Surgery, Fauji Foundation Hospital Rawalpindi from June 1999 to June 2003. Patients and methods: All patients who underwent appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis were divided into two groups. In Group-I simple ligation and in Group-II ligation with invagination of appendix stump was carried out. Patients were followed up for nine months to check the development of complications. Results: Both groups were similar with respect to age and sex. Simple ligation of the stump was done in 382 patients, while in 295 cases invagination of the stump after ligation was done. The incidence of postoperative wound infection (6.44%) and paralytic ileus (4.40%) was higher in Group-II as compared to Group-I. Conclusion: Simple ligation of appendix stump is better and safe procedure during appendicectomy.
机译:目的:比较急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术中单纯结扎阑尾结扎和掩埋的技术。设计:对677个阑尾切除术的比较研究。研究的地点和持续时间:1999年6月至2003年6月,福济基金会医院拉瓦尔品第普通外科。病人和方法:所有因单纯性阑尾炎而行阑尾切除术的患者均分为两组。在I组简单结扎中和在II组结扎阑尾的情况下进行结扎。对患者进行了九个月的随访,以检查并发症的发生情况。结果:两组在年龄和性别方面相似。 382例患者进行了简单的残端结扎,而结扎术后残端的295例发生了结扎。与II组相比,II组的术后伤口感染发生率(6.44%)和麻痹性肠梗阻(4.40%)更高。结论:单纯结扎阑尾残端是阑尾切除术中更好,安全的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号