首页> 外文期刊>SSM - Population Health >Best–worst scaling survey of preferences regarding the adverse effects of tobacco use in China
【24h】

Best–worst scaling survey of preferences regarding the adverse effects of tobacco use in China

机译:关于中国烟草使用不利影响的偏好的最差最差规模调查

获取原文
       

摘要

We use best–worst scaling to assess two types of concern levels of the adverse consequences of smoking in China. While the smoking cessation policy has worked well in Taiwan, more than 1 million people in mainland China are estimated to die every year from tobacco use. This study compares the preferences of Chinese individuals in the two jurisdictions (mainland versus Taiwan) and explores the possibility of information-based interventions. The relative importance of 13 adverse effects was assessed by conducting a web-based survey on a sample of 480 Chinese participants. The 13 items consist of various adverse effects of tobacco use: from long-term health risk, such as lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases, to reduction of physical capacity and sexual dysfunction, and disturbance to non-smokers. The resulting data suggest possible strategies to curb smoking. Subgroup analysis, focusing on gender, smoking status, and nicotine dependence, was also conducted. Lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in this order, rank highest for both types of respondents. On the other hand, high expenditures (13th) and weight gain after cessation (12th) are the lowest ranked for both. Measuring individual best–worst scores reveals substantial heterogeneity among respondents and that information-based intervention can help curb smoking. Highlights ? Best-worst scaling (BWS) is used to assess concerns on tobacco adverse effects. ? Adverse effects of tobacco are assessed for mainland and Taiwan residents. ? Lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and COPD rank highest for both. ? Information-based interventions are explored for Chinese smokers. ? Comparative results provide insights for a future anti-smoking policy.
机译:我们使用最差评估法来评估中国吸烟对不良后果的两种关注程度。尽管戒烟政策在台湾行之有效,但据估计,中国大陆每年因吸烟而死亡的人数超过100万人。这项研究比较了两个司法管辖区(大陆与台湾)中的中国人的偏好,并探讨了基于信息的干预措施的可能性。通过对480位中国参与者进行的基于网络的调查,评估了13种不良反应的相对重要性。这13个项目包括吸烟的各种不良影响:从长期健康风险(例如肺癌和心血管疾病)到身体能力和性功能障碍的减少以及对不吸烟者的干扰。所得数据表明了遏制吸烟的可能策略。还进行了以性别,吸烟状况和尼古丁依赖性为重点的亚组分析。在这两种类型的受访者中,肺癌,心血管疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病按此顺序排名最高。另一方面,高支出(第13位)和戒烟后体重增加(第12位)是两者中排名最低的。测量个人的最差成绩显示,受访者之间存在很大的异质性,基于信息的干预可以帮助遏制吸烟。强调 ?最差标度(BWS)用于评估对烟草不良影响的担忧。 ?对大陆和台湾居民的烟草不良影响进行了评估。 ?肺癌,心血管疾病和COPD均排名最高。 ?探索了针对中国吸烟者的基于信息的干预措施。 ?比较结果为未来的禁烟政策提供了见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号