...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Caudal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesiain infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery
【24h】

Caudal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesiain infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery

机译:罗哌卡因和布比卡因用于下腹部手术婴儿术后镇痛

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine 0.175% and bupivacaine 0.175% injected caudally into infants for lower abdominal surgery.Methods: Eighty infants, aged 3-12 months, ASA I-II scheduled to undergo lower abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: Group R received 1ml.kg-1 0.175% ropivacaine and Group B received 1ml.kg-1 0.175% bupivacaine via caudal route. Postoperative analgesia, sedation and motor block were evaluated with modified objective pain scale, three-point scale and modified Bromage scale respectively. Postoperative measurements including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), pain (OPS), sedation and motor block score were recorded for four hours in the postoperative recovery room. Parents were contacted by telephone after 24 hours to question duration of analgesia and side effects.Results: No significant differences were found among the groups in demographic data, MAP, HR, OPS and sedation scores during four hours postoperatively. The duration of analgesia was 527.5±150.62 minutes in Group R, 692.77±139.01 minutes in Group B (p=0.004). Twelve (30%) patients in Group R, 16 (40%) patients in groupB needed rescue analgesics (p=0.348). Rescue analgesics were administered (1 time/2 times) (9/3) (22.5/7.5%) in Group R and 16/0 (40/0%) in Group B, where no statistically significant difference was determined between the groups (p=0.071). Motor blockade was observed in 7 (17.5%) patients in Group R, and 8 (20%) patients in Group B (p=0.774).Conclusion: This study indicated, that a concentration of 0.175% ropivacaine and 0.175% bupivacaine administered to the infants via caudal route both provided effective and similar postoperative pain relief in infants, who underwent lower abdominal surgery.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.314.5432How to cite this:Cinar SO, Isil CT, Sahin SH, Paksoy I. Caudal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Pak J Med Sci 2015;31(4):903-908. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.314.5432This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:目的:比较罗非卡因0.175%和布比卡因0.175%尾巴注射入婴儿下腹部手术的术后镇痛效果。方法:将80例3-12个月大的ASA I-II婴儿(计划进行下腹部手术)随机分配至下腹部手术。两组之一:R组通过尾巴途径接受1ml.kg-1 0.175%罗哌卡因,B组接受1ml.kg-1 0.175%布比卡因。分别采用改良的客观疼痛量表,三点量表和改良的Bromage量表评估术后镇痛,镇静和运动阻滞。在术后恢复室中记录了四个小时的术后测量数据,包括平均动脉压(MAP),心率(HR),疼痛(OPS),镇静和运动阻滞评分。 24小时后通过电话与父母联系,询问镇痛的持续时间和副作用。结果:两组患者在术后四个小时内的人口统计学数据,MAP,HR,OPS和镇静评分没有显着差异。 R组镇痛时间为527.5±150.62分钟,B组镇痛时间为692.77±139.01分钟(p = 0.004)。 R组中有十二名(30%)患者,B组中有16名(40%)患者需要急救镇痛药(p = 0.348)。 R组进行了抢救性镇痛药(1次/ 2次)(9/3)(22.5 / 7.5%),B组进行了16/0(40/0%),但两组之间无统计学意义的差异( p = 0.071)。 R组中有7(17.5%)患者发生运动阻滞,B组中有8(20%)患者发生运动阻滞(p = 0.774)。结论:本研究表明,给予0.175%罗哌卡因和0.175%布比卡因的浓度经尾腹部手术的婴儿均能为下腹部手术的婴儿提供有效和类似的术后疼痛缓解。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.314.5432如何引用此信息:Cinar SO,Isil CT, Sahin SH,Paksoy I.罗哌卡因和布比卡因用于下腹部手术婴儿的术后镇痛。 Pak J Med Sci 2015; 31(4):903-908。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.314.5432这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款分发的开放访问文章,只要适当引用了原始作品,便可以在任何介质中不受限制地使用,分发和复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号