首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
【24h】

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

机译:实施菜单标签干预措施以支持健康食品选择的障碍和促进者:混合方法系统审核协议

获取原文
       

摘要

Menu labelling is continuing to gather public and legislative support as one of the potential environmental strategies for addressing the obesity pandemic. However, issues relating to implementation have been reported in countries where menu labelling has been introduced on a voluntary or mandatory basis. The aim of this mixed methods systematic review is to synthesise the empirical evidence on the barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices. This review will use the ‘best fit’ framework synthesis approach to synthesise qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods evidence. Peer-reviewed publications will be accessed through PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus. Grey literature will be accessed through Google Scholar, OpenGrey, RIAN, EThOS, ProQuest, WorldCat, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, and public health organisation websites. Screening reference lists, citation chaining and contacting authors of all included studies will be undertaken. There will be no restriction on menu labelling scheme or format, publication year or language; however, only primary research studies relevant to supply-side stakeholders will be eligible for inclusion. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. At least two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal; if consensus is required, another independent reviewer will be consulted. A combination of deductive coding, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as the a priori framework, and inductive analysis, using secondary thematic analysis, will be used. The overall process will assist in the construction of a new evidence-based conceptual model regarding the implementation of menu labelling interventions. The new model will be assessed for bias and a sensitivity analysis performed. Given the growing consensus that a systemic, sustained portfolio of obesity prevention strategies, delivered at scale, is needed to address the obesity epidemic, greater understanding of the practical issues relating to implementation of such strategies is required. Findings from this review will be used to develop a set of best-practice guidelines to enhance the adoption, implementation and sustainability of menu labelling interventions across countries worldwide. PROSPERO CRD42017083306.
机译:菜单标签正在继续收集公众和立法支持,作为解决肥胖大流行的潜在环境策略之一。但是,在自愿或强制采用菜单标签的国家中,已经报告了与实施有关的问题。这种混合方法的系统评价的目的是综合有关在实施菜单标签干预措施以支持健康食品选择方面的障碍和促进因素的经验证据。这项审查将使用“最适合”框架综合方法来综合定性,定量和混合方法的证据。同行评审的出版物可通过PubMed,EMBASE,CINAHL,PsycINFO,Web of Science和Scopus访问。灰色文献将通过Google学术搜索,OpenGrey,RIAN,EThOS,ProQuest,WorldCat,论文和论文网络数字图书馆,开放访问论文和论文以及公共卫生组织网站进行访问。筛选参考清单,引文链接以及所有纳入研究的作者。菜单标签方案或格式,出版年份或语言不受限制;但是,只有与供应方利益相关者相关的基础研究才有资格被纳入。研究质量将使用混合方法评估工具进行评估。至少两名独立的评审员将进行研究选择,数据提取和质量评估;如果需要达成共识,将咨询另一位独立审阅者。将演绎编码(使用实施研究综合框架作为先验框架)与归纳分析(使用辅助主题分析)相结合。整个过程将有助于构建有关菜单标签干预措施的新的基于证据的概念模型。将评估新模型的偏差并进行敏感性分析。鉴于越来越多的共识认为,需要大规模,系统地,持续的肥胖预防策略组合来应对肥胖流行,因此需要对与实施此类策略有关的实际问题有更多的了解。此次审查的结果将被用于制定一套最佳实践指南,以增强全球各国菜单标签干预措施的采用,实施和可持续性。 PROSPERO CRD42017083306。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号