首页> 外文期刊>Sustainable Agriculture Research >Evaluation of Cicer Milkvetch and Alfalfa Cultivars for Nutritive Value, Anti-Quality Factors and Animal Preference
【24h】

Evaluation of Cicer Milkvetch and Alfalfa Cultivars for Nutritive Value, Anti-Quality Factors and Animal Preference

机译:紫花苜蓿和苜蓿品种营养价值,抗品质因子和动物偏好性的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Cicer milkvetch (CMV; Astragalus cicer L.) is an alternative non-bloat legume to managing alfalfa. A 2-yr study was conducted to compare three CMV cultivars (Oxley II, Oxley, and Veldt) to AC Grazeland alfalfa (ALF; check forage) for nutritive value and animal preference. Each yr, replicate samples (n = 4) of each forage type were harvested late summer and analyzed for nutrient profile. Oxley II had lower (p 0.05) fiber content than AC Grazeland, while Oxley and Veldt were similar (p = 0.48) to AC Grazeland for neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and starch. In contrast, Oxley II had higher (p 0.05) net energy for gain (NEg) than AC Grazeland, and Oxley and Veldt were similar (p 0.05) to AC Grazeland for NEg. All three CMV varieties had similar levels of total digestible nutrients (TDN) (63.6 ± 0.6%; p 0.05), but had higher (p = 0.01) energy content than AC Grazeland alfalfa (54.9 ± 1.4% TDN). Selenium (Se) concentrations were similar (p 0.05) among CVM cultivars and less than 1 mg/kg DM, and no swainsonine or nitrotoxins were detected in the CMV cultivars. The Oxley II CMV tended (p = 0.06) to have a higher (139) relative feed value (RFV) compared to AC Grazeland (94), while Oxley and Veldt had moderate RFV values (128). Dry matter intake of Oxley II, Veldt, and Oxley CMV was 4, 18, and 28% greater than AC Grazeland, respectively. Based on the relative preference index (ratio of forage DMI to AC Grazeland alfalfa DMI), forage types are ranked as follows: AC Grazeland (1.0) Veldt (1.2) Oxley (1.4) Oxley II (1.7). Study results suggest that CMV cultivars harvested late summer, maintained higher forage quality with greater preference compared to alfalfa.
机译:紫花苜蓿(CMV; Astragalus cicer L.)是处理苜蓿的另一种非膨胀豆科植物。进行了为期2年的研究,比较了三个CMV品种(Oxley II,Oxley和Veldt)与AC Grazeland苜蓿(ALF;检查饲料)的营养价值和动物偏爱。每年夏末收获每种草料的每年重复样本(n = 4),并分析其营养成分。对于中性洗涤剂纤维(NDF),酸性洗涤剂纤维(ADF)和淀粉,Oxley II的纤维含量比AC Grazeland低(p <0.05),而Oxley和Veldt与AC Grazeland相似(p = 0.48)。相比之下,奥克斯利II的净能量获取(NEg)高于AC格拉泽兰(p> 0.05),奥克斯利和Veldt的NEg与AC格拉泽兰相似(p> 0.05)。这三种CMV品种的总可消化营养素(TDN)含量相似(63.6±0.6%; p> 0.05),但能量含量比AC Grazeland苜蓿(54.9±1.4%TDN)高(p = 0.01)。在CVM品种中,硒(Se)浓度相似(p> 0.05),且DM含量低于1 mg / kg,在CMV品种中未检测到猪油菜碱或硝基毒素。与AC Grazeland(94)相比,Oxley II CMV倾向于(p = 0.06)具有较高的(139)相对进料值(RFV),而Oxley和Veldt具有中等RFF值(128)。 Oxley II,Veldt和Oxley CMV的干物质摄入量分别比AC Grazeland高4、18和28%。根据相对偏好指数(饲料DMI与AC Grazeland苜蓿DMI的比率),对饲料类型进行如下排序:AC Grazeland(1.0)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号