首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence
【24h】

Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence

机译:建立系统评价方法概述的综合证据图:论文2 –偏倚评估的风险;研究结果的综合,介绍和总结;和证据的确定性评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Overviews of systematic reviews (SRs) attempt to systematically retrieve and summarise the results of multiple systematic reviews. This is the second of two papers from a study aiming to develop a comprehensive evidence map of the methods used in overviews. Our objectives were to (a) develop a framework of methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews (stage I)—the Methods for Overviews of Reviews (MOoR) framework—and (b) to create an evidence map by mapping studies that have evaluated overview methods to the framework (stage II). In the first paper, we reported findings for the four initial steps of an overview (specification of purpose, objectives and scope; eligibility criteria; search methods; data extraction). In this paper, we report the remaining steps: assessing risk of bias; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessing certainty of the evidence arising from the overview. In stage I, we identified cross-sectional studies, guidance documents and commentaries that described methods proposed for, or used in, overviews. Based on these studies, we developed a framework of possible methods for overviews, categorised by the steps in conducting an overview. Multiple iterations of the framework were discussed and refined by all authors. In stage II, we identified studies evaluating methods and mapped these evaluations to the framework. Forty-two stage I studies described methods relevant to one or more of the latter steps of an overview. Six studies evaluating methods were included in stage II. These mapped to steps involving (i) the assessment of risk of bias (RoB) in SRs (two SRs and three primary studies, all reporting evaluation of RoB tools) and (ii) the synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings (one primary study evaluating methods for measuring overlap). Many methods have been described for use in the latter steps in conducting an overview; however, evaluation and guidance for applying these methods is sparse. The exception is RoB assessment, for which a multitude of tools exist—several with sufficient evaluation and guidance to recommend their use. Evaluation of other methods is required to provide a comprehensive evidence map.
机译:系统评价(SR)概述试图系统地检索和总结多个系统评价的结果。这是一项研究的两篇论文中的第二篇,该论文旨在为概述中使用的方法建立全面的证据图。我们的目标是(a)建立用于进行,解释和报告概述的方法框架(第一阶段),即“审查概述方法(MOoR)”框架,以及(b)通过对已评估的研究进行制图来创建证据图框架的概述方法(第二阶段)。在第一篇论文中,我们报告了概述的四个初始步骤的发现(目的,目标和范围的确定;资格标准;搜索方法;数据提取)。在本文中,我们报告了剩余的步骤:评估偏见风险;研究结果的综合,介绍和总结;并评估从概述中得出的证据的确定性。在第一阶段,我们确定了横断面研究,指导文件和评论,它们描述了为概述提出或使用的方法。基于这些研究,我们开发了一个可能的概述方法的框架,并按进行概述的步骤进行了分类。所有作者都讨论并完善了该框架的多次迭代。在第二阶段,我们确定了评估方法的研究,并将这些评估映射到框架中。第一阶段的42个研究描述了与概述的一个或多个后续步骤相关的方法。第二阶段包括六项评估方法的研究。这些步骤对应于以下步骤:(i)评估SR中的偏倚风险(RoB)(两项SR和三项主要研究,所有报告均对RoB工具进行评估),以及(ii)结果的综合,陈述和总结(一项主要研究评估重叠的评估方法)。在进行概述的后面的步骤中,已经描述了许多方法。但是,使用这些方法的评估和指导很少。 RoB评估是一个例外,RoB评估存在大量工具,其中一些具有足够的评估和指导以推荐使用它们。需要评估其他方法以提供全面的证据图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号