...
首页> 外文期刊>Symmetry >A Comparison of Regularization Techniques in Deep Neural Networks
【24h】

A Comparison of Regularization Techniques in Deep Neural Networks

机译:深度神经网络中正则化技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

Artificial neural networks (ANN) have attracted significant attention from researchers because many complex problems can be solved by training them. If enough data are provided during the training process, ANNs are capable of achieving good performance results. However, if training data are not enough, the predefined neural network model suffers from overfitting and underfitting problems. To solve these problems, several regularization techniques have been devised and widely applied to applications and data analysis. However, it is difficult for developers to choose the most suitable scheme for a developing application because there is no information regarding the performance of each scheme. This paper describes comparative research on regularization techniques by evaluating the training and validation errors in a deep neural network model, using a weather dataset. For comparisons, each algorithm was implemented using a recent neural network library of TensorFlow. The experiment results showed that an autoencoder had the worst performance among schemes. When the prediction accuracy was compared, data augmentation and the batch normalization scheme showed better performance than the others.
机译:人工神经网络(ANN)引起了研究人员的极大关注,因为可以通过训练解决许多复杂的问题。如果在训练过程中提供了足够的数据,则人工神经网络能够取得良好的绩效结果。但是,如果训练数据不足,则预定义的神经网络模型会出现过度拟合和拟合不足的问题。为了解决这些问题,已经设计了几种正则化技术并将其广泛应用于应用程序和数据分析。但是,由于没有有关每种方案性能的信息,因此开发人员很难为开发的应用程序选择最合适的方案。本文通过使用天气数据集评估深度神经网络模型中的训练和验证错误,描述了正则化技术的比较研究。为了进行比较,每种算法都是使用TensorFlow的最新神经网络库实现的。实验结果表明,自动编码器的性能最差。当比较预测准确性时,数据扩充和批处理规范化方案显示出比其他方法更好的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号