首页> 外文期刊>Sustainable Construction & Design >A comparison of fatigue lifetime prediction models applied to variable amplitude loading
【24h】

A comparison of fatigue lifetime prediction models applied to variable amplitude loading

机译:应用于可变振幅载荷的疲劳寿命预测模型的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The loads imposed on, amongst others, offshore structures can vary considerably with time. Lifetime prediction methodologies need to consider possible acceleration and retardation of the crack growth rate due to load sequences. Models based on a linear accumulation of damage will have a limited accuracy and are not considered as a sufficiently valuable asset in lifetime prediction of structures subjected to variable amplitude loading. This necessitates more complex nonlinear damage evolution models that can be applied in a so-called cycle-by-cycle analysis. In this paper, a comparison is made between three cumulative damage models (Miner, modified Miner and weighted average) and two yield zone models (Wheeler and Willenborg). Experimental data of fatigue crack growth in offshore steel specimens subjected to sequential loading is used as basis of the comparison. The modified Miner model is the most promising of the cumulative damage models but the determination of the parameter α requires laboratory tests. Evaluation of the effects of variation in the model input parameters on estimated lifetime reveals a large influence for the Miner and weighted average approaches.
机译:除其他外,施加在海上结构上的负载可能会随时间变化很大。寿命预测方法需要考虑由于载荷序列可能导致的裂纹扩展速率的加速和延迟。基于损伤的线性累积的模型将具有有限的准确性,并且在经受可变振幅载荷的结构的寿命预测中,不会被视为足够有价值的资产。这就需要更复杂的非线性损伤演化模型,可以将其应用于所谓的逐周期分析中。在本文中,比较了三种累积损伤模型(矿工,修正矿工和加权平均)和两个屈服区模型(Wheeler和Willenborg)。作为对比的基础,采用了顺序加载的海上钢试样疲劳裂纹扩展的实验数据。修正的Miner模型是累积损伤模型中最有前途的模型,但是参数α的确定需要实验室测试。对模型输入参数变化对估计寿命的影响进行评估,发现对Miner方法和加权平均方法有很大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号