首页> 外文期刊>Syiar Hukum >TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PEMBATALAN PERATURAN DAERAH PROVINSI DI INDONESIA
【24h】

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PEMBATALAN PERATURAN DAERAH PROVINSI DI INDONESIA

机译:对印度尼西亚省级法规取消的司法审查

获取原文
           

摘要

The case of this thesis is how the regulation of judicial local act authority in Indonesia. And how the implementation of? 185 articel of act number 32/2004 about the local government. And what the implication of 144 article of act number 32/2004 about the local government and what the law instrument is appropriate with province act strike down. From the conceptual approach and statute approach, we can make conclusion that the judicial of local act could be done from two authority, judicial review with supreme court and executive review with president c.q the internal minister, the stating of local act in 185 article of act 32/2004, can’t to implementing, until the mixtime a long 30 days to stating the local act is not impelemented. And the executive regulation as the instrument to strike down the local act is wrong. Because of that, recommended to make harmonization or synchronization between executive and Supreme Court sincronisation? authority. And revise 185 article of act 32/2004? and the law instrument to strike down a province act is president decition.
机译:本文的案例是印度尼西亚如何规范地方司法管辖权。又如何执行?关于地方政府的第32/2004号法令有185条。以及第32/2004号法令第144条对地方政府的含义以及与省级法令相适应的法律文书有哪些。从概念方法和法规方法,我们可以得出结论,地方行为的司法可以由两个机构来完成,即最高法院的司法审查和内务大臣的行政长官的行政审查,在185条中阐明地方行为32/2004不能实施,直到长达30天的混合时间来声明本地行为才得以实施。而作为破坏当地行为的手段的行政法规是错误的。因此,建议在行政部门与最高法院的部门批准之间进行协调或同步吗?权威。并修订法案32/2004的185条?打击省级法案的法律手段是总统president令。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号