首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography
【24h】

General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography

机译:全科医生治疗痴呆症的行为和心理症状的知识,态度和经验:混合方法的方案系统评价和元民族志

获取原文
           

摘要

In the context of rising dementia prevalence, the workload of general practitioners (GPs) in dementia care is set to increase. However, there are many aspects of dementia care that GPs find challenging. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) affect the majority of people with dementia and is an aspect of dementia care that GPs find particularly difficult to manage. The aim of this mixed methods systematic review is to undertake a synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies on GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing BPSD. Seven electronic bibliographic databases will be searched from inception to present. All qualitative or quantitative studies that explore the knowledge, attitude or experiences of GPs towards the management of BPSD in community and/or residential settings will be eligible for inclusion. A meta-ethnography will be conducted to synthesise included studies. Primary outcome measures will include GPs’ experiences of managing BPSD, GPs’ knowledge of BPSD and their attitude to different approaches to the management of BPSD, in particular their attitude to non-pharmacological approaches. All included papers will be independently assessed for methodological validity by two reviewers using the following tools: the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research, the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool for intervention studies and the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational and analytical cross-sectional studies. As there is no agreed quality assessment tool for descriptive cross-sectional studies, an original tool will be developed. Two independent reviewers will apply the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) tool to the review findings. The results will be reported in line with the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. This study will be the first systematic review that synthesises the existing literature of GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing BPSD in community and residential care. This review will improve our understanding of GPs’ perspectives on the management of BPSD, and the results will be used to inform the development of an intervention to improve the management of BPSD in general practice. PROSPERO CRD42017054916 .
机译:在痴呆症患病率上升的背景下,痴呆症护理中全科医生的工作量将增加。但是,全科医生发现很多痴呆症护理方面的挑战。痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)影响大多数痴呆症患者,这是GP尤其难以管理的痴呆症护理方面。这种混合方法系统审查的目的是对GP的BPSD管理知识,态度和经验进行定性和定量研究。从开始到现在将搜索七个电子书目数据库。所有探索GP在社区和/或住宅环境中管理BPSD的知识,态度或经验的定性或定量研究均符合资格。将进行元民族志,以综合纳入研究。主要结果指标将包括全科医生治疗BPSD的经验,全科医生对BPSD的了解以及他们对BPSD管理不同方法的态度,尤其是他们对非药理学方法的态度。两名审稿人将使用以下工具,对所有纳入的论文的方法学有效性进行独立评估:乔安娜·布里格斯研究所进行定性研究的清单,干预研究的有效公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)工具以及美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的质量用于观察和分析横截面研究的评估工具。由于没有用于描述性横截面研究的公认的质量评估工具,因此将开发原始工具。两名独立的审阅者将对定性研究的审阅证据置信度(CERQual)工具应用于审阅结果。报告结果将与《报告定性研究综合报告》中的“提高透明度”相一致。这项研究将是第一份系统综述,综述了有关GP在社区和住宅护理中管理BPSD的知识,态度和经验的现有文献。这次审查将增进我们对GP对BPSD管理的看法的理解,其结果将用于制定干预措施,以改善一般实践中BPSD的管理。 PROSPERO CRD42017054916。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号