...
首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Comparative effectiveness of physical activity interventions and anti-hypertensive pharmacological interventions in reducing blood pressure in people with hypertension: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness of physical activity interventions and anti-hypertensive pharmacological interventions in reducing blood pressure in people with hypertension: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:体力活动干预和抗高血压药理学干预在降低高血压患者血压中的比较有效性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案

获取原文
           

摘要

The prevalence of hypertension is a major public health challenge. Despite it being highly preventable, hypertension is responsible for a significant proportion of global morbidity and mortality. Common methods for controlling hypertension include prescribing anti-hypertensive medication, a pharmacological approach, and increasing physical activity, a behavioural approach. In general, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological and behavioural approaches for reducing blood pressure in hypertension. A previous network meta-analysis suggested that physical activity interventions may be just as effective as many anti-hypertensive medications in preventing mortality; however, this analysis did not provide the comparative effectiveness of these disparate modes of intervention on blood pressure reduction. The primary objective of this study is to use network meta-analysis to compare the relative effectiveness, for blood pressure reduction, of different approaches to increasing physical activity and different first-line anti-hypertensive therapies in people with hypertension. A systematic review will be conducted to identify studies involving randomised controlled trials which compare different types of physical activity interventions and first-line anti-hypertensive therapy interventions to each other or to other comparators (e.g. placebo, usual care) where blood pressure reduction is the primary outcome. We will search the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and PsycInfo. For studies which meet our inclusion criteria, two reviewers will extract data independently and assess the quality of the literature using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Network meta-analyses will be conducted to generate estimates of comparative effectiveness of each intervention class and rankings of their effectiveness, in terms of reduction of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. This study will provide evidence regarding the comparability of two common first-line treatment options for people with hypertension. It will also describe the extent to which there is direct evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of increasing physical activity and initiating anti-hypertensive therapy. PROSPERO CRD42017070579.
机译:高血压的流行是主要的公共卫生挑战。尽管可以高度预防,但高血压还是导致全球发病率和死亡率的重要原因。控制高血压的常用方法包括开处方抗高血压药,药理学方法和增加体育锻炼,行为学方法。通常,对于降低高血压血压的药理和行为方法的相对有效性知之甚少。先前的一项网络荟萃分析表明,体育锻炼干预措施在预防死亡率方面可能与许多抗高血压药物一样有效。但是,该分析并未提供这些不同干预方式对降低血压的比较效果。这项研究的主要目的是使用网络荟萃分析来比较高血压患者不同的增加身体活动的方法和不同的一线抗高血压疗法对降低血压的相对有效性。将进行系统的审查,以鉴定涉及随机对照试验的研究,这些试验将血压降低是最主要的不同类型的体育锻炼干预措施和一线抗高血压治疗干预措施之间或与其他比较者(例如安慰剂,常规护理)进行比较的情况。主要结果。我们将搜索Cochrane库,MEDLINE和PsycInfo。对于符合我们纳入标准的研究,两名评价员将独立提取数据并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估文献的质量。将进行网络荟萃分析,以得出收缩压和舒张压降低方面每种干预类别的相对有效性估计值及其有效性等级。这项研究将为有关高血压患者的两种常见的一线治疗方案的可比性提供证据。它还将描述关于增加体育锻炼和开始抗高血压治疗的相对有效性的直接证据的程度。 PROSPERO CRD42017070579。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号