首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Urban Residential Land Use Reconstruction under Dual-Track Mechanism of Market Socialism in China: A Case Study of Chengdu
【24h】

Urban Residential Land Use Reconstruction under Dual-Track Mechanism of Market Socialism in China: A Case Study of Chengdu

机译:市场社会主义双轨机制下的城市住宅土地利用重构-以成都为例

获取原文
       

摘要

We study urban residential land use changes by analyzing the massive migration and relocation of two typical social classes: employees in government departments (EGD) and urban demolition displaced households (UDDH). After the reform and opening-up of China that has taken place during the last 30 years, the residential land use of both the EGD and UDDH groups has been notable in terms of the changing urban landscape in China’s cities. A considerable number of studies highlight the large scale relocations of weaker groups usually through sample surveys at a microscopic scale, which sheds light on the relationships between market forces and government intervention and power. However, employees hired by state government departments and related branches (Shiye Danwei) have been neglected. Bridging the empirical research gap and using Chengdu as a case study, we compare residential relocations of EGD and UDDH groups in Chengdu. Our analysis based on field surveys conducted from 2009–2013 indicates that the relocations of EGD and UDDH are spatially agglomerated due to China’s unique dual-track mechanism driven by market forces and government power since the late 1970s. The study shows that most of the UDDH are migrated from urban centers to fringes, while a large number of EGD still agglomerate close to urban centers. Government interventions differentiate residential relocations of EGD and UDDH, and market mechanisms reinforce these relocations. Potential problems caused by the dual-track mechanism are finally discussed and summarized.
机译:我们通过分析两个典型的社会阶层(政府部门的雇员(EGD)和城市拆迁的流离失所家庭(UDDH))的大规模迁移和迁移来研究城市居民土地使用的变化。在过去30年的中国改革开放之后,从中国城市景观的变化来看,EGD和UDDH集团的住宅用地都非常引人注目。大量研究表明,通常通过微观规模的抽样调查,对较弱的群体进行了大规模的安置,从而揭示了市场力量与政府干预和权力之间的关系。但是,被州政府部门及相关部门(十单丹威)聘用的员工被忽略了。弥合实证研究差距,并以成都为例,我们比较了EGD和UDDH组在成都的住宅搬迁。我们根据2009年至2013年进行的实地调查得出的分析结果表明,由于自1970年代末以来,由市场力量和政府力量推动的中国独特的双轨机制,EGD和UDDH的搬迁在空间上是聚集的。研究表明,大多数UDDH都从城市中心迁移到边缘地区,而大量EGD仍在城市中心附近聚集。政府干预区分了EGD和UDDH的住宅搬迁,而市场机制加强了这些搬迁。最后讨论和总结了由双轨机制引起的潜在问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号