首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Urban Cultivation and Its Contributions to Sustainability: Nibbles of Food but Oodles of Social Capital
【24h】

Urban Cultivation and Its Contributions to Sustainability: Nibbles of Food but Oodles of Social Capital

机译:城市耕作及其对可持续发展的贡献:吃点东西,但社会资本的障碍

获取原文
           

摘要

The contemporary interest in urban cultivation in the global North as a component of sustainable food production warrants assessment of both its quantitative and qualitative roles. This exploratory study weighs the nutritional, ecological, and social sustainability contributions of urban agriculture by examining three cases—a community garden in the core of New York, a community farm on the edge of London, and an agricultural park on the periphery of San Francisco. Our field analysis of these sites, confirmed by generic estimates, shows very low food outputs relative to the populations of their catchment areas; the great share of urban food will continue to come from multiple foodsheds beyond urban peripheries, often far beyond. Cultivation is a more appropriate designation than agriculture for urban food growing because its sustainability benefits are more social than agronomic or ecological. A major potential benefit lies in enhancing the ecological knowledge of urbanites, including an appreciation of the role that organic food may play in promoting both sustainability and health. This study illustrates how benefits differ according to local conditions, including population density and demographics, operational scale, soil quality, and access to labor and consumers. Recognizing the real benefits, including the promotion of sustainable diets, could enable urban food growing to be developed as a component of regional foodsheds to improve the sustainability and resilience of food supply, and to further the process of public co-production of new forms of urban conviviality and wellbeing.
机译:当代对全球北部作为可持续粮食生产组成部分的城市耕作的兴趣值得对其数量和质量作用进行评估。这项探索性研究通过考察以下三个案例来权衡都市农业在营养,生态和社会可持续发展方面的贡献:纽约市中心的社区花园,伦敦边缘的社区农场和旧金山外围的农业公园。我们对这些地点的实地分析(经一般估算证实)表明,相对于其集水区人口而言,粮食产量非常低;城市食物中的很大一部分将继续来自城市外围以外的多个食物集散区,而这些食物集散区往往远远超过了。与城市农业相比,耕种是一种比农业更合适的名称,因为与农业或生态相比,其可持续性收益更具社会效益。主要的潜在好处在于增强都市人的生态知识,包括赞赏有机食品在促进可持续性和健康方面的作用。这项研究说明了收益如何因当地条件而异,包括人口密度和人口统计学,经营规模,土壤质量以及获得劳动力和消费者的机会。认识到包括促进可持续饮食在内的真正惠益,可以使城市粮食种植成为区域食物集散的一部分,以改善粮食供应的可持续性和复原力,并进一步促进公共合作生产新形式的粮食。城市的欢乐和福祉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号