首页> 外文期刊>Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. >Repair of the pronator quadratus after volar plate fixation in distal radius fractures: a systematic review
【24h】

Repair of the pronator quadratus after volar plate fixation in distal radius fractures: a systematic review

机译:vol骨远端vol骨钢板固定术后前屈肌的修复:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

To position the volar plate on the distal radius fracture site, the pronator quadratus muscle needs to be detached from its distal and radial side and lifted for optimal exposure to the fracture site. Although the conventional approach involves repair of the pronator quadratus, controversy surrounds the merits of this repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of patients with distal radius fractures treated with pronator quadratus repair after volar plate fixation versus no pronator quadratus repair. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, on 23 July 2015. All studies comparing pronator quadratus repair with no pronator quadratus repair in adult patients undergoing volar plate fixation for distal radius fractures were included. The primary outcome was the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12?months. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, grip strength, post-operative pain and complications. A total of 169 patients were included, of which 95 underwent pronator quadratus repair, while 74 patients underwent no pronator quadratus repair. At 12?months follow-up no statistically significant differences in DASH-scores and range of motion were observed?between pronator quadratus repair and no repair. Moreover, post-operative pain and complication rates were similar between both groups. At 12?months of follow-up, we do not see any advantages of pronator quadratus repair after volar plate fixation in the distal radius. However, a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn from this systematic review due to a lack of available evidence.
机译:为了将掌骨板定位在radius骨远端骨折部位,需要从其远侧和radial骨侧分离前阔肌,并抬起其,以最佳地暴露于骨折部位。尽管常规方法涉及对前屈肌的修复,但围绕该修复方法的优点存在争议。这项研究的目的是比较手掌钢板固定后与未进行前屈肌直肌修复的患者进行quad骨直肌修复的radius骨远端骨折的功能结局。 2015年7月23日,在Medline,EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中心登记册中进行了系统的搜索。所有纳入比较了comparing骨远端固定的成年患者的vol骨翻修修复与无pro骨翻修修复的所有研究。主要结果是在12个月时的手臂,肩膀和手部残疾(DASH)得分。次要结果包括运动范围,握力,术后疼痛和并发症。总共包括169例患者,其中95例进行了前屈肌翻修,而74例未进行了前屈肌翻修。在12个月的随访中,前角肌修复与未修复的DASH评分和运动范围均无统计学差异。此外,两组之间的术后疼痛和并发症发生率相似。在12个月的随访中,我们没有看到在radius骨远端固定了掌骨钢板后,进行前屈肌直肌修复的任何优势。但是,由于缺乏可用的证据,无法从该系统评价中得出明确的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号