首页> 外文期刊>Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences >Microbiological Assay of Two Selected Products of Ceftriaxone Powder for Injection from Pharmaceuticals' Market in Sudan
【24h】

Microbiological Assay of Two Selected Products of Ceftriaxone Powder for Injection from Pharmaceuticals' Market in Sudan

机译:苏丹药品市场上两种注射用头孢曲松粉的精选产品的微生物学测定

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Different techniques have classically been used to evaluate and assure the quality of medicines circulated on the market; one of the commonly uses is chemical analysis. However, some evidence has shown that there are other important indicators (e.g. bioequivalence, relative potency, etc.) that should also be considered when evaluating the quality of pharmaceutical products. Materials and Methods: A microbiological assay was conducted to compare the relative potency of two Ceftriaxone products (with a third one used as standard product) from the market using 3 reference bacteria including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. Serial dilutions were made with the corresponding 1, 4, 8, 16 and 32-fold Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Ceftriaxone against the bacteria under investigation. Results: The relative potency of one product compared to the standard product was estimated to be within the acceptable range of bioequivalence (89.6%), while the other product showed unacceptable relative potency (72.3%). Conclusions: The microbiological assay is an effective and simple method for comparing the equivalency of injectable products. A complaint reporting system about quality and effectiveness problems needs to be considered as a priority source of such information to inform decision-makers.
机译:背景:传统上已经使用了不同的技术来评估和确保市场上流通的药物的质量。化学分析是常用的方法之一。但是,一些证据表明,在评估药品质量时还应考虑其他重要指标(例如,生物等效性,相对效力等)。材料和方法:进行了微生物分析,比较了市场上使用两种参考细菌(包括肺炎链球菌,肺炎克雷伯菌和金黄色葡萄球菌)的两种头孢曲松产品(第三种用作标准产品)的相对效力。用相应的头孢曲松钠的1、4、8、16和32倍最小抑菌浓度(MIC)对所研究的细菌进行系列稀释。结果:与标准产品相比,一种产品的相对效能估计在可接受的生物等效性范围内(89.6%),而另一种产品的相对效能却不可接受(72.3%)。结论:微生物测定法是比较注射剂当量的一种有效而简单的方法。需要将有关质量和有效性问题的投诉报告系统视为此类信息的优先来源,以告知决策者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号