...
首页> 外文期刊>Stem cells translational medicine. >Safety and Efficacy of Adult Stem Cell Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischemic Heart Failure (SafeCell Heart): A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
【24h】

Safety and Efficacy of Adult Stem Cell Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischemic Heart Failure (SafeCell Heart): A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

机译:成人干细胞疗法治疗急性心肌梗死和缺血性心力衰竭(SafeCell心脏)的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be beneficial in treating both acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic heart failure (IHF). However, the safety profile and efficacy of MSC therapy is not well‐known. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials that evaluated the safety or efficacy of MSCs for AMI or IHF. Embase, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to September 27, 2017. Studies that examined the use of MSCs administered to adults with AMI or IHF were eligible. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess bias of included studies. The primary outcome was safety assessed by adverse events and the secondary outcome was efficacy which was assessed by mortality and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A total of 668 citations were reviewed and 23 studies met eligibility criteria. Of these, 11 studies evaluated AMI and 12 studies evaluated IHF. There was no association between MSCs and acute adverse events. There was a significant improvement in overall LVEF in patients who received MSCs (SMD 0.73, 95% CI 0.24–1.21). No significant difference in mortality was noted (Peto OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.38–1.22). Results from our systematic review suggest that MSC therapy for ischemic heart disease appears to be safe. There is a need for a well‐designed adequately powered randomized control trial (with rigorous adverse event reporting and evaluations of cardiac function) to further establish a clear risk‐benefit profile of MSCs.
机译:临床前和临床证据表明,间充质干细胞(MSC)在治疗急性心肌梗塞(AMI)和缺血性心力衰竭(IHF)方面均可能有益。但是,MSC治疗的安全性和疗效尚不为人所知。我们对临床试验进行了系统的回顾,以评估MSC对AMI或IHF的安全性或有效性。从开始到2017年9月27日,检索了Embase,PubMed / Medline和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册。研究了对AMI或IHF成年人使用MSC的研究。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的偏倚。主要结果是通过不良事件评估的安全性,次要结果是通过死亡率和左心室射血分数(LVEF)评估的疗效。总共对668次引用进行了审查,并且有23项研究符合资格标准。其中,11项研究评估了AMI,12项研究评估了IHF。 MSC与急性不良事件之间没有关联。接受MSC的患者的总LVEF有显着改善(SMD 0.73,95%CI 0.24–1.21)。死亡率没有显着差异(Peto OR 0.68,95%CI 0.38–1.22)。我们系统评价的结果表明,MSC治疗缺血性心脏病似乎是安全的。有必要进行精心设计的,具有足够功能的随机对照试验(进行严格的不良事件报告和心功能评估),以进一步建立明确的MSC风险获益特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号