...
首页> 外文期刊>Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo >Evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of protocol cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin compared to protocol fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin C in locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer
【24h】

Evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of protocol cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin compared to protocol fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin C in locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer

机译:与方案氟尿嘧啶,阿霉素和丝裂霉素C相比,方案顺铂,5-氟尿嘧啶,亚叶酸钙在局部晚期和转移性胃癌中的疗效和毒性评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction. Still there is no consensus on the choice of the most efficient and the least toxic chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Nowadays few therapy protocols are available for treating this disease. Objective. Study was conducted to compare the efficacy and toxicity of FAM (flurouracil, doxorubicin, mitomycin C) with CDDP and FU/FA (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin) protocols in patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. Methods. This randomized study involved a group of 50 patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, who had not previously undergone chemotherapy treatment. Progression free survival, overall survival and drug toxicity were evaluated. For statistical analysis chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier curve and the log rank test were used. Results. The overall response rate was 20% in the group treated with FAM and 24% in the group treated with CDDP, FU/FA (4% of patients from each group had complete response), but without significant statistical difference. Median survival was 10.9 months in the FAM group and 11.8 months in CDDP, FU/FA group, with no statistically significant difference. Non-haematological and haematological toxicities of CDDP, FU/FA were considerably less frequent than of FAM, and there was no treatment related deaths in any of the groups. Conclusion. Both investigated regimens demonstrated moderate efficacy. The study shows in favour of justified application of both protocols, while in regard to toxicity CDDP and FU/FA can be recommended as preferable treatment for locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. New strategies should be considered for better efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. New strategies are necessary with the goal to achieve a better therapeutic effect.
机译:介绍。关于在晚期胃癌的治疗中选择最有效,毒性最小的化疗方案仍未达成共识。如今,很少有治疗方案可用于治疗这种疾病。目的。进行了研究以比较FAM(氟尿嘧啶,阿霉素,丝裂霉素C)与CDDP和FU / FA(顺铂,5-氟尿嘧啶,亚叶酸)方案在局部晚期和转移性胃癌患者中的疗效和毒性。方法。这项随机研究涉及50例局部局部晚期或转移性胃癌患者,这些患者先前未接受过化疗。评价无进展生存期,总生存期和药物毒性。为了进行统计分析,卡方检验,Kaplan-Meier曲线和对数秩检验被使用。结果。 FAM组的总缓解率为20%,CDDP,FU / FA组的总缓解率为24%(每组4%的患者有完全缓解),但无统计学差异。 FAM组中位生存期为10.9个月,CDDP,FU / FA组中位生存期为11.8个月,差异无统计学意义。 CDDP,FU / FA的非血液和血液毒性比FAM的发生频率要低得多,并且在任何一组中均没有与治疗相关的死亡。结论。两种研究方案均显示出中等效力。该研究表明,两种方案均应合理使用,而毒性方面,可推荐CDDP和FU / FA作为局部晚期和转移性胃癌的首选治疗方法。应该考虑采用新的策略以更好地治疗晚期胃癌。为了达到更好的治疗效果,必须采取新的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号