...
首页> 外文期刊>Sports medicine - open >Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions
【24h】

Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions

机译:等轴测收缩过程中颈肌肌电-力关系及其可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundSusceptible to injury, the neck is subject to scientific investigations, frequently aiming to elucidate possible injury mechanisms via surface electromyography (EMG) by indirectly estimating cervical loads. Accurate estimation requires that the EMG-force relationship is known and that its measurement error is quantified. Hence, this study examined the relationship between EMG and isometric force amplitude of the anterior neck (AN), the upper posterior neck (UPN), and the lower posterior neck (LPN) and then assessed the relationships’ test-retest reliability across force-percentiles within and between days. MethodsEMG and force data were sampled from 18 participants conducting randomly ordered muscle contractions at 5–90% of maximal voluntary force during three trials over 2 days. EMG-force relationships were modeled with general linear mixed-effects regression. Overall fitted lines’ between-trial discrepancies were evaluated. Finally, the reliability of participants’ fitted regression lines was quantified by an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). ResultsA rectilinear model had the best fit for AN while positively oriented quadratic models had the best fit for UPN and LPN, with mean adjusted conditional coefficients of determination and root mean square errors of 0.97–0.98 and 4–5%, respectively. Overall EMG-force relationships displayed a maximum 6% between-trial discrepancy and over 20% of maximal force, and mean ICC was above 0.79 within day and 0.27–0.61 between days across areas. Corresponding SEM was below 12% both within and between days across areas, excluding UPN between days, for which SEM was higher. ConclusionsEMG-force relationships were elucidated for three neck areas, and provided models allow inferences to be drawn from EMG to force on a group level. Reliability of EMG-force relationship models was higher within than between days, but typically acceptable for all but the lowest contraction intensities, and enables adjustment for measurement imprecision in future studies.
机译:背景技术易受伤害的颈部受到科学研究的考验,通常旨在通过间接估计宫颈负荷通过表面肌电图(EMG)阐明可能的伤害机制。准确的估算要求已知EMG力关系,并且必须量化其测量误差。因此,这项研究检查了肌电图和前颈(AN),上后颈(UPN)和下后颈(LPN)等距力幅值之间的关系,然后评估了各力之间该关系的重测信度。在几天之内和之间的百分位。方法在2天的三项试验中,从18位随机有序进行肌肉收缩的参与者(最大自愿力量的5–90%)中取样了ECG和力量数据。 EMG力关系是用一般线性混合效应回归建模的。评估了整体拟合线的试验间差异。最后,通过组内相关系数(ICC)和测量的标准误差(SEM)量化参与者拟合的回归线的可靠性。结果:直线模型最适合AN,而正向二次模型最适合UPN和LPN,调整后的确定条件系数和均方根误差分别为0.97-0.98和4-5%。总体EMG力关系显示出最大6%的试验间差异和超过最大力的20%,平均ICC在一天之内高于0.79,而跨区域的一天之间为0.27-0.61。跨区域内和跨区域内对应的SEM均低于12%,不包括日间SEM较高的区域之间的UPN。结论阐明了三个颈部区域的心电图与力的关系,并提供了允许从肌电图得出推论以在小组水平上进行推论的模型。 EMG力关系模型的可靠性在几天之内比几天之内更高,但是除了最低的收缩强度外,其他所有模型通常都可以接受,并且可以在以后的研究中针对测量的不精确性进行调整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号