首页> 外文期刊>Sports Medicine International Open >The Polar? OH1 Optical Heart Rate Sensor is Valid during Moderate-Vigorous Exercise
【24h】

The Polar? OH1 Optical Heart Rate Sensor is Valid during Moderate-Vigorous Exercise

机译:极地? OH1光学心率传感器在中度剧烈运动中有效

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose Traditional heart-rate monitoring through the use of electrocardiograms or chest-worn heart rate sensors can be challenging in certain sports or in field settings. New technologies, such as photoplethysmography (PPG), have enabled heart-rate monitoring at alternate sites. However, to date, the accuracy and validity of various PPG sensors has not been examined in detail. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the validity of an arm-worn PPG sensor during yoga sequences. Methods Fifteen college-aged men and women participated in a ~45?min power vinyasa yoga class. During the class, participants wore Polar? H7 chest straps and RCX3 receivers (criterion) and Polar? OH1 arm bands on their upper right arm (practical). Mean differences were compared via a paired t-test, heart rate during yoga using a time*device repeated measures ANOVA, and agreement assessed with Bland-Altman analysis. Results Mean heart rates during yoga were not different (mean difference=0.76, 95% CI: –0.54 to 2.06; p=0.229). Yoga created a main effect of time on heart rate (pp=0.86) or interaction (p=0.90). Mean bias±95% limits of agreement was 0.76±1.30?bpm, with a typical error of 2.42±1.49?bpm and a coefficient of variation of 1.8±1.5%. Conclusions Results of the present investigation revealed that the Polar? OH1 is a valid measure of heart rate during moderate-vigorous exercise. Future validation studies should consider other exercise modes and participant characteristics.
机译:目的在某些运动或田野环境中,通过使用心电图或胸磨损的心率传感器进行传统的心率监测可能具有挑战性。光电容积描记术(PPG)等新技术已使备用站点的心率监测成为可能。但是,迄今为止,尚未详细检查各种PPG传感器的准确性和有效性。本研究的目的是确定瑜伽过程中手臂佩戴PPG传感器的有效性。方法15名大学生男女参加了〜45分钟的力量vinyasa瑜伽课。上课时,参与者穿着Polar吗? H7胸带和RCX3接收器(标准)和Polar?右上臂带有OH1臂带(实用)。通过配对t检验比较平均差异,使用时间*设备重复测量方差分析对瑜伽期间的心率进行比较,并通过Bland-Altman分析评估一致性。结果瑜伽期间的平均心率没有差异(平均差异= 0.76,95%CI:–0.54至2.06; p = 0.229)。瑜伽对时间(pp = 0.86)或互动(p = 0.90)产生了主要影响。平均偏差±95%一致限为0.76±1.30?bpm,典型误差为2.42±1.49?bpm,变异系数为1.8±1.5%。结论本次调查的结果表明,极地? OH1是中度运动时心率的有效量度。未来的验证研究应考虑其他锻炼模式和参与者特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号