...
首页> 外文期刊>Southern Med Review >Pharmaceutical policies in European countries in response to the global financial crisis
【24h】

Pharmaceutical policies in European countries in response to the global financial crisis

机译:欧洲国家应对全球金融危机的药品政策

获取原文

摘要

id="__p1" class="p p-first">Objective: The objective of this paper is to analyze which pharmaceutical policies European countries applied during the global financial crisis. id="__p2">Methods: We undertook a survey with officials from public authorities for pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement of 33 European countries represented in the PPRI (Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information) network based on a questionnaire. The survey was launched in September 2010 and repeated in February 2011 to obtain updated information. id="__p3">Results: During the survey period from January 2010 to February 2011, 89 measures were identified in 23 of the 33 countries surveyed which were implemented to contain public medicines expenditure. Price reductions, changes in the co-payments, in the VAT rates on medicines and in the distribution margins were among the most common measures. More than a dozen countries reported measures under discussion or planned, for the remaining year 2011 and beyond. The largest number of measures were implemented in Iceland, the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), Greece, Spain and Portugal, which were hit by the crisis at different times. id="__p4" class="p p-last">Conclusions: Cost-containment has been an issue for high-income countries in Europe – no matter if hit by the crisis or not. In recent months, changes in pharmaceutical policies were reported from 23 European countries. Measures which can be implemented rather swiftly (e.g. price cuts, changes in co-payments and VAT rates on medicines) were among the most frequent measures. While the “crisis countries” (e.g. Baltic states, Greece, Spain) reacted with a bundle of measures, reforms in other countries (e.g. Poland, Germany) were not directly linked to the crisis, but also aimed at containing public spending. Since further reforms are under way, we recommend that the monitoring exercise is continued.
机译:id =“ __ p1” class =“ p p-first”>目的:本文的目的是分析欧洲国家在全球金融危机期间采用的制药政策。 id =“ __ p2”>方法:我们进行了研究根据问卷调查,在PPRI(药品定价和报销信息)网络中与33个欧洲国家的公共部门官员进行了有关药品定价和报销的调查。该调查于2010年9月启动,并于2011年2月重复进行,以获取更新的信息。 id =“ __ p3”>结果:从2010年1月至2011年2月的调查期间,在接受调查的33个国家中,有23个国家确定了89项措施。实施以控制公共药品支出。价格降低,共付额的变化,药品的增值税率和分配利润率是最常见的措施。十多个国家报告了在讨论中或计划采取的措施,涉及2011年余下的年份及以后。在不同时期遭受危机打击的冰岛,波罗的海国家(爱沙尼亚,拉脱维亚,立陶宛),希腊,西班牙和葡萄牙实施了数量最多的措施。 id =“ __ p4” class =“ p p- last“>结论:成本控制一直是欧洲高收入国家面临的问题,无论是否受到危机打击。最近几个月,有23个欧洲国家报告了药物政策的变化。可以相当迅速地实施的措施(例如降价,共付额的变化和药品增值税率)是最常见的措施之一。尽管“危机国家”(例如波罗的海国家,希腊,西班牙)采取了一系列措施,但其他国家(例如波兰,德国)的改革并非与危机直接相关,而是旨在遏制公共支出。由于正在进行进一步的改革,我们建议继续进行监督。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号