首页> 外文期刊>Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases >Cholera and household water treatment why communities do not treat water after a cholera outbreak: a case study in Limpopo Province
【24h】

Cholera and household water treatment why communities do not treat water after a cholera outbreak: a case study in Limpopo Province

机译:霍乱和家庭用水处理为何霍乱爆发后社区不处理水:以林波波省为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Cholera is one of the common diseases in developing countries caused by consumption of contaminated and untreated drinking water. A study was conducted 7?months after a cholera outbreak in Vhembe district, Limpopo, South Africa. The aim of the study was to assess if the communities were still conforming to safe water practices after an outbreak of cholera.Methodology: One hundred and fifty-two (152) participants from 11 villages were recruited to form 21 focus groups, with a mean of 7. The interview transcripts were coded and arranged based on the study themes.Results: Of the 21 groups in 11 villages, three villages were using water from boreholes, six were using river water and three were using mixed sources which included river, canal and spring water, three depended on municipal tanks and only six were using tap water. Only 19% of the respondents treated their water, even though the majority of communities reported treatment of water as a priority. Four villages claimed they never received environmental health education at all, while most of the villages confirmed they received education during a cholera outbreak.Conclusion: Regardless of the outbreak and health education efforts done, communities continued using unprotected water sources without any form of treatment, as they perceived it to be unimportant. Sustainable water supplies and environmental health education should be continued after an outbreak as it is important for public health gains.
机译:背景:霍乱是发展中国家因食用受污染和未经处理的饮用水而引起的常见疾病之一。霍乱在南非林波波的Vhembe区爆发7个月后进行了一项研究。该研究的目的是评估霍乱暴发后社区是否仍符合安全用水规范。方法:从11个村庄招募了一百二十五(152)名参与者组成了21个焦点小组,平均共有7个访谈记录被编码并根据研究主题进行排列。结果:在11个村庄的21个小组中,有3个村庄使用井眼水,六个村庄使用河水,三个村庄使用混合水,包括河流,运河和泉水,其中三个依靠市政水箱,只有六个在使用自来水。尽管大多数社区都将水的处理列为优先事项,但只有19%的受访者对水进行了处理。有四个村庄声称他们根本没有接受过环境健康教育,而大多数村庄都证实他们在霍乱爆发期间接受了教育。结论:无论爆发和进行了健康教育工作如何,社区继续使用未经保护的水源而没有任何形式的处理,因为他们认为这并不重要。爆发后应继续进行可持续的水供应和环境健康教育,因为这对获得公共健康至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号