首页> 外文期刊>South East European Journal of Economics and Business >Measuring Culture Effect size Differences in Slovenian and Portuguese Leadership Practices: Cross-Cultural Leadership Universality or Contigency?
【24h】

Measuring Culture Effect size Differences in Slovenian and Portuguese Leadership Practices: Cross-Cultural Leadership Universality or Contigency?

机译:衡量斯洛文尼亚和葡萄牙领导实践中文化影响的大小差异:跨文化领导的普遍性还是偶然性?

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper measures the cultural effect size across five types of leadership practices by using the Leadership Practice Inventory (LPI) instrument and drawing on the GLOBE research project framework. It tests cultural universality vs. contingency in five LPI leadership practices in an East-West EU comparison, both with an ex-socialist past. It employs four different effect size statistics. The paper contributes to the narrowing of the empirical gap in researching leadership practices in a small, East-West European country context. Only two of the five leadership practices show statistically significant effect sizes. Furthermore, the leadership practice Encouraging the heart is the only one to display a relatively moderate effect size. Thus, the evidence seems to support the universalist perspective over the contingency perspective.
机译:本文通过使用领导力实践清单(LPI)工具并利用GLOBE研究项目框架来衡量五种类型的领导力实践中的文化效应规模。它在东西方欧盟的比较中测试了五个LPI领导实践中的文化普遍性与偶然性,二者均与前社会主义者的过去进行了比较。它采用了四个不同的效果大小统计信息。本文有助于缩小在东西欧小国背景下研究领导力实践的经验差距。在五种领导方式中,只有两种表现出统计上显着的效果大小。此外,领导实践“鼓励心脏”是唯一显示相对中等效果的方法。因此,证据似乎支持普遍性观点而非权变观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号