...
首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Science >The ongoing evolution of humanness: perspectives from Darwin to de Chardin
【24h】

The ongoing evolution of humanness: perspectives from Darwin to de Chardin

机译:人类的持续发展:从达尔文到德查尔丁的视角

获取原文
           

摘要

The nature of humanness is discussed from observations made by Aristotle in 4th-century Greece, through to those of Charles Darwin, Teilhard de Chardin and William Shakespeare. Attempts to define humanness upon a narrow range of criteria, as some have tried, is argued as flawed, for humanness is more elusive than a single or a few demonstrated phenomena. The path that Darwin pursued in determining the place of humans in nature in his book The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex is assessed from a 19thcentury perspective; the difficulties he faced, both personally and with the broader public, are reviewed and then evaluated in a modern context. Darwin’s thesis adheres to scientific principles, and is debated, defended and later verified on these principles. This is somewhat at variance to the approach adopted by the priest-scientist de Chardin a century later in his major work, The Phenomenon of Man—in which an attempt is made to reconcile a deep Christian faith with science. De Chardin scores well from a theological viewpoint, but fails on scientific grounds as his thesis moves beyond the realms of empiricism into mysticism. Surprisingly, de Chardin’s predicament of a future wherein human evolution enters a new stage of consciousness through the noosphere (an invisible layer of thought encompassing the globe) has been partially realised through the worldwide web, although the nature of the web is almost certainly not what de Chardin might have anticipated, or desired. Science too fails to answer all, particularly the nature of God. Darwin considered the Creator in several of his works and does not dismiss the concept of a farseeing deity, although we are left with the notion that he died agnostic. Humanness is derived from an elevated moral code and this is reflected in our arts, particularly literature, wherein we may temporally reflect upon quintessential human traits such as mercy. However, expression of the arts is only achievable by the individual being part of a greater whole: the human community, the essence of which is distilled in the Bantu concept of ubuntu, wherein humanness is best realised through the act of living in harmony.
机译:人类的本性从亚里士多德在四世纪希腊的观察到查尔斯·达尔文,泰勒哈德·德·查丁和威廉·莎士比亚的观察中进行了讨论。正如某些人所尝试的那样,尝试以狭窄的标准来定义人类的尝试被认为是有缺陷的,因为人类比一个或几个已证明的现象更难以捉摸。达尔文(Darwin)在其著作《人类的后裔以及与性相关的选择》中确定人类在自然中所处的位置的途径是从19世纪的角度进行评估的;对他个人和广大公众所面临的困难进行了回顾,然后在现代背景下进行了评估。达尔文的论文遵循科学原理,经过辩论,辩护并随后根据这些原理进行了验证。这与一个世纪后的牧师科学家德查尔丁在其主要著作《人类现象》中所采用的方法有所不同。在《人类现象》中,人们试图将深层的基督教信仰与科学调和。德查尔丁从神学的观点上得分很高,但是由于他的论文从经验主义的领域转向神秘主义,因此在科学上失败了。出乎意料的是,德查尔丁的未来困境,即人类进化通过noosphere(环绕地球的无形思想层)进入意识新阶段,尽管网络的本质几乎可以肯定不是, de Chardin可能曾预期或期望。科学也无法回答所有问题,尤其是上帝的本质。达尔文在他的几本作品中都考虑了造物主,尽管我们留下了他死于不可知论的观念,但他并没有否认有远见的神的概念。人性源自高尚的道德规范,这反映在我们的艺术中,尤其是文学作品中,在其中我们可能会暂时反思诸如怜悯之类的典型人类特质。但是,只有通过个体成为更大整体的一部分,才能实现艺术表达:人类社区的本质是从班图人的Ubuntu概念中提炼出来的,其中人类最好通过和睦相处的行为来实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号