...
首页> 外文期刊>South African medical journal = >Paediatric dental chair sedation: An audit of current practice in Gauteng, South Africa
【24h】

Paediatric dental chair sedation: An audit of current practice in Gauteng, South Africa

机译:儿科牙科椅镇静剂:对南非豪登省当前实践的审核

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is often required to perform dental procedures in children. Serious adverse outcomes, while rare, are usually preventable OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of dental practitioners making use of paediatric dental chair PSA in Gauteng Province, South Africa, describe their PSA practice, and determine compliance with recommended safety standards METHOD: A prospective, contextual, descriptive study design was used, with 222 randomly selected dental practitioners contacted to determine whether they offered paediatric dental chair PSA. Practitioners offering PSA were then asked to complete a web-based questionnaire assessing their practice RESULTS: Of the 213 dental practitioners contacted, 94 (44.1%; 95% confidence interval 37 - 51) provided PSA to children. Most patients were 1 - 5 years old, although there were practices that offered PSA to infants. While most procedures were performed under minimal to moderate sedation, deep sedation and general anaesthesia were also administered in dental rooms. Midazolam was the most frequently used sedative agent, often in conjunction with inhaled nitrous oxide; 28.1% of PSA providers administered a combination of three or more agents. Presedation patient assessment was documented in 83.0% of cases, and informed consent for sedation was obtained in 75.6%. The survey raised several areas of concern regarding patient safety: 41.3% of dental practices did not use any monitoring equipment during sedation; the operator was responsible for the sedation and monitoring of the patient in 41.3%; 43.2% did not keep any recommended emergency drugs; and 19.6% did not have any emergency or resuscitation equipment available. Most respondents (81.8%) indicated an interest in sedation training CONCLUSION: Paediatric dental chair PSA was offered by 44.1% of dental practitioners interviewed in Gauteng. Modalities of PSA provided varied between practices, with a number of safety concerns being raised.
机译:背景:儿童进行牙科手术通常需要程序性镇静镇痛(PSA)。严重的不良后果(虽然很少见)通常是可以预防的目标:确定南非豪登省使用儿科牙科椅PSA的牙科医生的比例,描述其PSA做法,并确定是否符合建议的安全标准方法:前瞻性,使用情境描述性研究设计,与222名随机选择的牙科医生联系,以确定他们是否提供小儿牙科椅PSA。然后要求提供PSA的从业者完成基于网络的问卷调查以评估他们的实践。结果:在213名接触的牙科医生中,有94名(44.1%; 95%置信区间37-51)为儿童提供了PSA。尽管有些做法可为婴儿提供PSA,但大多数患者为1-5岁。虽然大多数手术都是在最低至中等的镇静状态下进行的,但在牙科室也要进行深度镇静和全身麻醉。咪达唑仑是最常使用的镇静剂,通常与吸入的一氧化二氮一起使用。 28.1%的PSA提供者管理了三种或更多代理的组合。在83.0%的病例中记录了镇静前患者评估,在75.6%的患者中获得了镇静知情同意。该调查引起了与患者安全有关的几个方面的关注:镇静期间41.3%的牙科实践未使用任何监测设备;操作者负责患者的镇静和监测的比例为41.3%; 43.2%没有保留任何推荐的紧急药物; 19.6%没有可用的紧急或复苏设备。大多数受访者(81.8%)表示对镇静训练感兴趣。结论:豪登省44.1%的牙科医生提供了小儿牙科椅PSA。 PSA的模式因实践而异,并引发了许多安全隐患。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号