...
首页> 外文期刊>South African medical journal = >Emergency care research priorities in South Africa
【24h】

Emergency care research priorities in South Africa

机译:南非的紧急护理研究重点

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Emergency care research is rarely undertaken in low- and middle-income countries. A manageable 'road map' for research in South African (SA) emergency care is needed to address research gaps. OBJECTIVE: To identify, collate and prioritise research topics from identified knowledge gaps in emergency care in SA. METHODS: Seventy-six individuals were invited to participate in a modified Delphi study. Participants were requested to suggest important research topics before rating them. Consensus was achieved when 75% of participants strongly agreed or disagreed. Participants then ranked the agreed statements before selecting the most appropriate methodology relating to study design, funding and collaboration. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty topics were suggested by 31 participants. Topics were collated into 123 statements before participants rated them. Consensus was achieved for 39 statements. The highest-ranked priority in the prehospital group was to determine which prehospital interventions improve outcomes in critically ill patients. The competence of emergency care providers in performing common lifesaving skills was deemed the most important in clinical emergency care. Implementing and reviewing quality improvement systems scored the highest under general systems and safety management. Only 22 statements achieved consensus regarding study design. The National Department of Health was the preferred funding source, while private organisations and emergency care societies were identified as possible collaborative partners. CONCLUSION: This study provides expert consensus on priority research areas in emergency care in SA as a guide for emergency care providers to ensure evidence-based care that is relevant to the SA population.
机译:背景:在中低收入国家很少进行急诊研究。需要针对南非(SA)紧急护理研究的易于管理的“路线图”,以解决研究空白。目的:从SA急诊中已发现的知识差距中识别,整理和优先研究主题。方法:76名个体被邀请参加改良的Delphi研究。要求参与者在对重要研究主题进行评级之前提出重要建议。当> 75%的参与者强烈同意或不同意时,就可以达成共识。然后,参与者在选择与研究设计,资金和协作相关的最合适方法之前,对商定的陈述进行排名。结果:31名参与者提出了350个主题。在参与者对主题进行评分之前,将主题整理成123条陈述。 39项声明达成了共识。院前组中排名最高的优先事项是确定哪些院前干预措施可改善危重患者的预后。在临床紧急护理中,紧急护理提供者执行常见的救生技能的能力被认为是最重要的。在常规系统和安全管理下,实施和审核质量改进系统得分最高。关于研究设计只有22条陈述达成共识。国家卫生部是首选的资金来源,而私人组织和急救协会被确定为可能的合作伙伴。结论:本研究为SA急诊中的优先研究领域提供了专家共识,作为急诊提供者确保与SA人群相关的循证护理的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号