首页> 外文期刊>South African medical journal = >Diagnosis of food allergy: History, examination and in vivo and in vitro tests
【24h】

Diagnosis of food allergy: History, examination and in vivo and in vitro tests

机译:食物过敏的诊断:病史,检查以及体内和体外试验

获取原文
       

摘要

One cannot depend on one single test to diagnose food allergy. A detailed history is an essential initial step in cases of suspected food allergy. Aspects of the history should be gathered separately for each food being considered, as a patient may experience different types of reactions with various foods, each of which requires individual diagnostic and management strategies. History alone is not diagnostic and additional measures of sensitisation or food challenges are often required. In suspected immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy, skin-prick tests (SPTs) and/or measurement of serum specific IgE antibodies (ImmunoCAP) to suspected foods is used to prove sensitisation. Sensitisation does not, however, confirm clinical food allergy as these tests indicate an immunological response to the specific allergen, but the diagnosis requires a clear correlation between the test result and clinical reaction (by positive history or food challenge). The magnitude of the test result (SPT mean wheal size or ImmunoCAP level in kU/L) correlates with the likelihood of clinical allergy, but not the severity of a reaction. Choice of the allergens tested should be guided by the history, but limited to the lowest necessary number to avoid false-positive results. Tests for sensitisation to foods should not be performed when the history indicates that such foods are tolerated. Ninety-five per cent positive predictive values (where a clinical reaction can be predicted in 95% of cases) have been described for immediate reactions, but may be population specific. There are no validated tests to confirm non-IgE- or mixed IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergies. Diagnosis of this group of allergies depends on elimination of the suspected food, clearance of symptoms, and recurrence of symptoms on re-introduction of the food.
机译:一个人不能依靠一项测试来诊断食物过敏。在怀疑食物过敏的情况下,详细的病史是必不可少的第一步。应针对所考虑的每种食物分别收集病史方面的内容,因为患者可能会对各种食物产生不同类型的反应,每种反应都需要单独的诊断和管理策略。单纯的病史并不能诊断,通常需要采取其他措施来提高认识或应对食物挑战。在怀疑的免疫球蛋白E(IgE)介导的过敏反应中,皮刺试验(SPT)和/或对怀疑食物的血清特异性IgE抗体(ImmunoCAP)的测量可用于证明致敏性。但是,敏化不能确定临床食物过敏,因为这些测试表明对特定过敏原有免疫反应,但诊断需要测试结果与临床反应之间有明确的相关性(通过阳性病史或食物挑战)。测试结果的大小(SPT平均风团大小或以kU / L为单位的ImmunoCAP水平)与临床过敏的可能性相关,但与反应的严重程度无关。应根据病史选择测试的过敏原,但应限制在必要的最低数目,以免出现假阳性结果。当病史表明可以耐受这些食物时,不应进行对食物的致敏性测试。对于即时反应,已有95%的阳性预测值(其中95%的病例可预测临床反应)已被描述,但可能是特定人群的。没有经过验证的测试来确认非IgE或混合的IgE和非IgE介导的食物过敏。对这一类过敏的诊断取决于消除疑似食物,清除症状以及重新引入食物后症状复发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号