首页> 外文期刊>Sosyoloji Konferanslari >The Second Sociology in Turkish Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis of 30 Introductory Sociology Textbooks
【24h】

The Second Sociology in Turkish Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis of 30 Introductory Sociology Textbooks

机译:土耳其高等教育中的第二种社会学:对30种社会学入门教材的定量分析

获取原文
       

摘要

There is a distinction between the literary forms of research-oriented scientific practice and those of scientific education, popularized in the early decades of the 20th century. This distinction emphasizes differences between “journal science”, whose audiences are mostly specialists, and “popular science” or “textbook science”, written for non-specialist public or students. In the early 2000’s, the term “two sociologies” was coined by Hamilton and Form to mark a similar differentiation in sociology. However, the disciplinary attention to this distinction and its problems can be traced back to the 1920s, and with the help of the existing research on sociology textbooks, some important solutions has been produced in Western academies. By stressing the difference between “two sociologies”, this research presents the findings of a quantitative content analysis on Turkish introductory sociology textbooks for higher education. The main objective of the study is to satisfy the need for such researches in Turkey and to describe the problems of the texts. The study results strengthen the argument that there is a link between standardization issues in the discipline and the textbook problems.
机译:研究型科学实践的文学形式与科学教育的文学形式之间存在区别,这种文学形式在20世纪初期开始流行。这种区别强调了主要面向专家的“新闻科学”和为非专业公众或学生编写的“流行科学”或“教科书科学”之间的区别。在2000年代初期,汉密尔顿(Hamilton)和形式(Form)提出了“两种社会学”一词,标志着社会学上的类似差异。但是,学科界对这种区别及其问题的关注可以追溯到1920年代,并且借助于对社会学教科书的现有研究,西方学术界已经提出了一些重要的解决方案。通过强调“两种社会学”之间的差异,本研究提出了对土耳其高等教育入门社会学教科书进行定量内容分析的结果。该研究的主要目的是满足土耳其进行此类研究的需要并描述案文中的问题。研究结果进一步证明了该学科的标准化问题与教科书问题之间存在联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号