首页> 外文期刊>South African Computer Journal >A Study of Evolutionary Algorithm Selection Hyper-Heuristics for the One-Dimensional Bin-Packing Problem
【24h】

A Study of Evolutionary Algorithm Selection Hyper-Heuristics for the One-Dimensional Bin-Packing Problem

机译:一维装箱问题的进化算法选择超方法研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Hyper-heuristics are aimed at providing a generalized solution to optimization problems rather than producing the best result for one or more problem instances. This paper examines the use of evolutionary algorithm (EA) selection hyper-heuristics to solve the offline one-dimensional bin-packing problem. Two EA hyper-heuristics are evaluated. The first (EA-HH1) searches a heuristic space of combinations of low-level construction heuristics for bin selection. The second (EA-HH2) explores a space of combinations of both item selection and bin selection heuristic combinations. These EA hyper-heuristics use tournament selection to choose parents, and mutation and crossover with hill-climbing to create the offspring of each generation. The performance of the hyper-heuristics is compared to that of each of the low-level heuristics applied independently to solve this problem. Furthermore, the performance of both hyper-heuristics is also compared. The comparisons revealed that hyper-heuristics in general perform better than any single low-level construction heuristic in solving the problem. In addition to this it was found that the hyper-heuristic exploring a space of both item selection and bin selection heuristic combinations is more effective than the hyper-heuristic searching a space of just bin selection heuristic combinations. The performance of this hyper-heuristic was found to be comparable to other methods applied to the same benchmark sets of problems.
机译:超启发式算法旨在为优化问题提供一种通用解决方案,而不是针对一个或多个问题实例产生最佳结果。本文研究了使用进化算法(EA)选择超启发式方法解决离线一维装箱问题。评估了两种EA超启发式方法。第一个(EA-HH1)搜索低级构造试探法组合的试探法空间以进行垃圾箱选择。第二篇(EA-HH2)探讨了项目选择和箱选择启发式组合的组合空间。这些EA超启发式游戏使用锦标赛选择来选择父母,并通过爬坡进行变异和交叉来创造每一代的后代。将超启发式方法的性能与为解决此问题而单独应用的每种低级启发式方法的性能进行比较。此外,还比较了两种超启发式方法的性能。比较表明,在解决问题上,超启发式方法通常比任何单个低层构造启发式方法表现更好。除此之外,发现超启发式探索项目选择和箱选择启发式组合的空间比超启发式搜索仅箱选择启发式组合的空间更有效。发现这种超启发式方法的性能可与应用于相同基准问题集的其他方法相媲美。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号