首页> 外文期刊>Soil and Water Research >Optimisation of Irrigation Regime for Early Potatoes, Late Cauliflower, Early Cabbage and Celery
【24h】

Optimisation of Irrigation Regime for Early Potatoes, Late Cauliflower, Early Cabbage and Celery

机译:早马铃薯,晚花椰菜,早白菜和芹菜灌溉制度的优化

获取原文
           

摘要

The paper deals with optimisation of threshold suction pressure of soil water on light soils for early potatoes, early cabbage, late cauliflower and celery on the basis of results of small-plot field experiments with differentiated irrigation regime. Experiments were conducted in 2003–2005. Threshold suction pressures of soil water were identical for all crops: 15 kPa in treatment I, 30 kPa in treatment II, 60 kPa in treatment III, and 120 kPa in treatment IV. Precipitation, air temperature and relative humidity, global solar radiation, wind speed and direction were measured by an automated meteorological station. Reference and actual evapotranspiration was determined for the experimental crops according to FAO Paper No. 56 and by means of a biological curve (BC) in 2003–2005. To compare these two methods of calculation of actual evapotranspiration the soil moisture balance was found out. Based on the influence on marketable yield and proportion of the crop quality grades it is possible to determine the optimum threshold suction pressure on light loamy-sand soils in early potatoes, late cauliflower and cabbage 30 kPa and in celery 15 kPa. 80% of available soil water capacity (ASWC) corresponds to the threshold suction pressure 30 kPa, and as much as 96% of ASWC corresponds to 15 kPa. The seasonal irrigation depths determined on the basis of soil moisture balance, in which the crop evapotranspiration (ETc) is calculated either according to FAO 56 or by the BC, are substantially different from the really achieved irriga-tion depths in the treatments where optimal suction pressure is maintained. For potatoes, the really achieved values of seasonal irrigation depths are nearer to the depths calculated by the BC, while for the other vegetables (cauliflower, cabbage and celery) they are more similar to the depths calculated by FAO 56 methodology. The theoretical irrigation depths calculated by the BC method sometimes differ substantially from those based on FAO 56. These differences are at maximum for cauliflower and celery and at minimum for cabbage and decrease with the decreasing irrigation depths.
机译:在小田间田间灌溉试验结果的基础上,研究了早熟马铃薯,早白菜,晚花椰菜和芹菜的轻水土壤吸水阈值的优化方法。实验于2003–2005年进行。在所有作物上,土壤水的阈值吸力均相同:处理I为15 kPa,处理II为30 kPa,处理III为60 kPa,处理IV为120 kPa。降水,空气温度和相对湿度,太阳总辐射,风速和风向由自动气象站测量。根据粮农组织第56号文件,通过2003-2005年的生物曲线确定了参考作物和实际的蒸散量。为了比较这两种计算实际蒸散量的方法,发现了土壤水分平衡。根据对可销售产量和作物品质等级比例的影响,可以确定早熟马铃薯,晚花椰菜和卷心菜30 kPa和芹菜15 kPa的轻质壤土沙质土壤的最佳阈值抽吸压力。可用土壤水容量(ASWC)的80%对应于阈值吸入压力30 kPa,多达96%的ASWC对应于15 kPa。根据土壤水分平衡确定的季节性灌溉深度,其中根据粮农组织56或由卑诗省计算的作物蒸散量(ETc)与最佳吸水处理中实际达到的灌溉深度大不相同。保持压力。对于马铃薯,季节性灌溉深度的真正实现值更接近于卑诗省计算的深度,而对于其他蔬菜(花椰菜,白菜和芹菜),其值与粮农组织56方法计算的深度更相似。通过BC方法计算的理论灌溉深度有时与基于FAO 56的理论灌溉深度有很大不同。这些差异在花椰菜和芹菜中最大,在白菜中最小,随着灌溉深度的减小而减小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号